Time for action: It's crucial the Federal Government invests in education and training in the agricultural sector. |
AUSTRALIA needs to boost
agricultural skills to feed Asia, writes BRIDGET McKENZIE
Trade
Minister Craig Emerson and Prime Minister Julia Gillard have been keen to talk up the need for
Australia to fill the plates of Asia with our locally grown produce.
But a critical skills shortage
threatens our agricultural abilities to meet increasing global demand for food
and fibre.
The message is not getting through to
Gen Y that with a career in agriculture you can make a difference and a dollar.
Australia
already exports 60 per cent of its produce, and ABARES says we could lift the value of agricultural exports by 140
per cent by 2050 - but we need a skilled, competent workforce.
Efforts to engage and address the
shortage, identified by the Council of Deans of Agriculture in 2008, have been
sporadic, with the number of universities offering agricultural-based courses
in Australia halving between 2000 and 2010.
The Government must invest in
agricultural-sector education and training so we can drive productivity gains
and remain internationally competitive.
In the past fortnight, a Senate inquiry
and Victorian Government report have gone out, extensively examining the
industry's need for a skilled workforce.
Both highlight issues of concern for
agricultural education - issues of low enrolment levels, the sector's image and
remuneration, and the cost of delivering agricultural education.
It is not surprising that after a
decade of drought followed by floods, and several agribusinesses closing their
doors locally, a career in agriculture has not been encouraged by parents or
schools.
Bright, articulate students who do want
a career in the sector are being told not to waste a high tertiary-entrance
score on agriculture - so it's little wonder 30 agronomist vacancies went
begging across northwest Victoria last year.
Throughout the inquiry it was clear the
agriculture industry wants practically-trained graduates from all levels of the
education process.
Funding agribusiness education is
cost-intensive, and this is not acknowledged in current funding models.
Research tailored to our growing
conditions, soil types and business practices is essential for future
productivity gains.
In 2008-09, the Federal Government
spent less than $160 million on its agricultural research and development. In
2005, China spent $2.7 billion, the bulk government-funded.
It's time to invest in our future.
Both inquiries found academics and
industry must practically engage with the teaching profession to promote
agriculture in schools.
Turning student teachers on to
agriculture, not only as a subject in its own right but also as an example for
investigating wider concepts such as science, technology and history, may occur
during their time studying at university.
The consequence of letting another
review, like so many before it, languish as a talking point for vested
interests will see us losing ground economically and socially.
The future of regional Australia has
always been - and will continue to be - built on the back of thriving
agricultural businesses.
There is enough talk about the problem.
Action is what is needed now, because it takes time to train people and to
change attitudes.
We have a great story to tell -
exciting careers, in industries that are high-tech, internationally competitive
and based in the regions.
The menu is written and the Government
would do well to digest the reports' contents.
It's time to plate up.
Original Article Here
No comments:
Post a Comment