Showing posts with label Organic farming. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Organic farming. Show all posts

Tuesday, 11 November 2014

Strategies for the promotion of organic agriculture in developing countries

Written by Azeem Tariq
Organic agriculture provides developing countries a broad variety of economic, cultural, social and environmental benefits. The scientific studies in Asia, Africa and Latin America specify that organic farmers usually have more earning as compare to conventional counterparts. New developments in the organic technologies have the possibilities of sustaining the yield for long period of time, although improving the biodiversity, soil fertility and other ecosystem services. Exceptionally, organic agriculture is well suited to the smallholder farmers because it makes poor farmers less dependent of expensive external inputs and provides them the higher and stable income, which improves the food security. Furthermore, organic agriculture in developing countries keeps alive the farmers traditional practices and crop varieties.  
Less use of chemical substances in organic agriculture prevent the risk of ground and surface water contamination by nutrient leaching for instant, 57% of nitrate leaching lower by organic agriculture compared to the conventional practices. Organic farming also have the potential to reduce the climate change effects, scientific findings have prove that organic farming use 20 to 56 % less energy in per unit dry matter production of crop as compare to conventional agriculture. Furthermore, organic farms can sequester 3 to 8 tons more carbon per hectare that illustrates the potential of organic agriculture to meet the Kyoto target of countries to reduce the CO2 emission. These findings clearly stated that organic farming favorable trade for sustainable development, poverty reduction and healthy environment in the developing countries.
For successful execution of organic farming in developing countries there is the need of intrusion in the strategies related to; promotion of organic research; development of systems of standard; provide support for development of local, regional, national and international market for organic products; the dependence and sustainable use of natural resources; enhance the knowledge and skills of poor farmers through education and training workshops; improvement in value addition by developing post harvest handling technologies, storage and preservation techniques; and participation of the special interest groups such as women, youth and vulnerable. 

Thus, to promote the organic agriculture in developing countries there is need to set policies and incentives for smallholder farmers to keep on farming depending on natural resource utilization and lower the dependence on external inputs. 

Saturday, 16 March 2013

First organic agriculture lab set up in Albania

The Turkish International Cooperation Agency (TIKA) has built an organic agriculture laboratory which follows international standards to make analysis and tests in Albania.

TIKA supports the organic agriculture methods in Albania to improve agricultural activities. Under a project TIKA has opened the first ever organic agricultural laboratory in Albania. The lab gives an opportunity to conduct scientific research with its latest high technology devices.

The President of Agricultural University Tirana, Fatos Harizaj, expressed her pleasure and gratitude for the lab. Ardian Maci, Dean of Agriculture and Environment Faculty, said they would work more efficiently thanks to the lab. He also stated they were hopeful for the future of organic agriculture in Albania.

One-fourth of Albania is composed of arable lands and 60% of the employed population works in the agricultural sector.
Original Article Here

Wednesday, 16 January 2013

Local Non-Profit To Host Eco-Agriculture Conference

Want to know more about what the Farm Bill means to consumers, how to butcher your own meat, or ways to better market your organic products?

The local Ecological Farming Association is hosting the oldest and largest ecological agricultural gathering in the West from Jan. 24 to 26 in Pacific Grove in Monterey County. 

The 33rd Annual EcoFarm Conference – this year with the theme of ‘Feed the World You Live In’ – will be filled with four days of workshops on production, marketing, business, ecological conservation and social issues such as the GMOs and biodynamic farming, according to the event organizers.

The conference is supported in part by Watsonville's Driscoll's. 

With over 1,500 participants, EcoFarm will host artisanal food tastings, live entertainment, and an Exhibitor Marketplace showcasing over fifty organic and ecologically-based businesses and organizations.

There will also be farmer mixers, an awards ceremony, farmer roundtable discussions, and office hours giving farmers and ranchers the opportunity to discuss their challenges one-on-one with experts and non-profit organizations.

Participants can also register for a pre-conference session on Jan. 22 on Butchery Skills, hosted by master butchers Rian Rinn of Wyeth Acres and Loren Ozki of Flea Street Café/CoolEatz.

The conference has counted 72,000 participants over the past 32 years, according to organizers.

To register, visit the conference's 2013 website. 

Original Article Here

Thursday, 29 November 2012

Organic agriculture is the key to 2012 worldwide failing agricultural yields

Organic Agriculture may just hold the key to these problems. It is one of the best practices that ensure environmental sustainability by sustaining soil fertility, ecosystems and the health of people. It relies on locally adapted improved ecological processes and cycles as well as natural biodiversity rather than the use of synthetic inputs and genetically modified materials.

Published studies show that organic farming systems are more resilient to predicted weather extremes and can produce higher yields than conventional farming systems (Drinkwater, Wagoner and Sarrantonio 1998; Welsh, 1999; Pimentel, 2005).

The International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) is currently advocating the adoption of organic agriculture worldwide.

World-wide local governments need to promote such agricultural practices that boost local agricultural yields, thereby helping alleviate failing crop yields. In Africa, countries like Djibouti, Ethiopia, Eritrea, Kenya, Somalia, Sudan and Uganda; currently suffer from extreme droughts, floods and invasion of migratory pests that affect crops.

Organic agriculture can be the solution. Let’s think sustainability for future generations!
Original Article Here

Saturday, 24 November 2012

Agriculture department lauds gains in organic farming

By Teresa Ellera

NEGROS Occidental is now leading in the organic farming movement in the country.

This was revealed by the Bureau of Agricultural Products and Fisheries Standards (BAPFS) in a survey conducted among all the provinces in the Philippines.

Salvador Salacup, Assistant Secretary and BAPFS Director, said Negros is the most active in the country in terms of the organic farming movement, specifically in terms of the hectarage of lands that are converted into organic farms as well as stakeholders.

Salacup represented Agriculture Secretary Proceso Alcala during the opening of the Organic Festival Wednesday.

Salacup said he personally witnessed the growth of organic producers in the province.

“The secretary is happy with the turnout of this organic festival. There are a total of 120 participant-exhibitors today and it's an indication of the interest and the passion of the Negrenses to really support the organic farming movement,” he said.

Salacup was also in the province during the last two years that the organic festival was held.

Last year there were 65 participant exhibitors, up from 40 in the last two years.

“Negros is now in the forefront in the organic movement and we can see the determination of your leaders here,” Salacup further said.

The Organic Festival is jointly supported by the Department of Agriculture (DA) and the Provincial Government of Negros Occidental.

Salacup said that DA has been doing productivity enhancement by making sure that the farmers know of the organic technology and methodology in organic farming. The agency also provides services like vermiculite technology and shredders.

He said that he discussed on Wednesday with Governor Alfredo Marañon Jr. the possibility of producing organic feeds like corn and taugi in the province.

Salacup also discussed with Marañon plans to expand the Negros Organic Sugar production.

“We will come up with all the plans and make sure that it is certified that they are surely organic products for international market. Japan who has been buying muscovado from Negros, Australia and Korea are very much interested,” he said. (TDE)
Original Article Here 

Wednesday, 12 September 2012

The Future of Agriculture Is Not Conventional

This organic nonsense has to stop. I'd like to politely request that those who don't know agriculture cease writing about it as though they do, stoking an already divisive debate that misses the heart of the problem we face: We're not sure how we should be growing food, and thus we're not sure how to eat.

Anyone who suggests that a crop can be raised without the provision of nutrients and pest management should not opine on agriculture. Roger Cohen, I'm talking to you.

Saturday's opinion piece in the New York Times, "The Organic Fable," shows me just how far off course the discussion of agricultural production has gotten, because it spreads misinformation and focuses squarely on the wrong problem. If we continue to debate organic versus conventional, continue to view food choices as an emblem of class, and continue to use the nine billion future people of the world as a gauntlet that the human race must run, we are in trouble because the question is not first about production. It's about distribution.

We produce enough to feed 1.3 billion more people than we actually do. And that's in American proportions. In 2000, the USDA reported that Americans consumed almost 2,000 pounds of food per person per year. Meanwhile, 1.3 billion tons of global food production goes to waste each year. Production by any method, standard or label is not our most pressing problem.

Getting production where it is needed and wanted is another story. We've got a billion or so people on this planet consuming too much of the wrong kinds of calories and another approximate billion getting too few of the right nutrients. Most food production happens far from population centers, and timing is everything, whether you're moving kale to market or wheat to a mill, so properly matching supply with demand is tricky. Here we are in 2012, endowed with information and technology that together can make just about any transaction instantaneous. Yet we rely on supply chains that emerged in the 19th century to connect us with our food.

The diversity that agricultural products present complicates matters too. Because of weather, seed variety, origin, soil conditions and a host of other factors, not every tomato tastes the same and sweet corn from my home state of Minnesota is like corn from nowhere else. I value that distinction in my food.

On the whole, our economy does not.

We produce and consume food within a structure that was built for undifferentiated, commodity products. The processes that move vast amounts of crops from harvest, to processing, to wholesale, to retail, to you, keep the producer and the consumer conveniently separated -- by about $0.84 for every dollar you spend. The anonymous middle of merchants, distributors, sellers and superstores has driven consumers to rely on certifications like organic to tell them more about the products they're buying than anyone else will. Producers, in turn, seek that certification as a way to distinguish their products in the marketplace.

Because so far they are all we've had to rely on to see something, anything, through the haze of the modern food system, labels have an inflated value. But don't let that fool you into thinking that only spoiled rich folks, as Cohen would have it, feel strongly about the short- and long-term effects their food has on themselves, their families and their environments.

Look at Growing Power, where Will Allen has built an urban farming empire-of-everyman. Look at the Bed-Stuy CSA of Brooklyn, where middle income families subsidize shares so their lower income neighbors can participate in getting food directly from farms. Look at the verdant farmers market culture in northern Iowa. Look at the efforts of farmers in Tchula, Mississippi, to grow food -- not corn, not soy, not cotton -- to feed their county first, and everyone else they can thereafter.

If anything, the debate surrounding how we produce and move food should unite us. Articles like Cohen's are a soap box, and soak up our energy with debate when they should instead focus on shared principles: sufficient food to feed our people, production technology and innovation (from nutrient-rich composting techniques and drip irrigation, to GPS systems in John Deere tractors) that facilitate efficient and sufficient food production, soil and water systems that promise years and years of sustained agricultural production, and access for every single person to the abundance that we now know, but that our great-grandparents did not.

The science should focus on how we get there. I'd like to see, for example, a comparison of per-acre nutrient yields and revenue for six different production systems: conventional and certified organic commodity, conventional and certified organic fruit and vegetable under mass production, conventional but diversified fruit and vegetable production, and fruit and vegetable production under what we might call "beyond organic," "practical," "sustainable" or whatever term most effectively conveys the rational approach of a growing number of farmers to use the best means they have to produce a crop that is healthy, high-yielding and good to eat. Personal experience suggests that the last of these, which takes place right now on small- and mid-sized enterprises, is our greatest hope.

The future may not be organic but it is also not conventional. We should set aside the debate about organics and start identifying at a large scale an alternative path for the production, distribution, purchase and consumption of the food that we all rely on for sustenance.

Original Article Here

Sunday, 9 September 2012

Common sense reasons to support organic agriculture


Sasha Lyutse’s Blog


Everyone loves a good [rhetorical] food fight. This week, a ruckus erupted over a Stanford University study, which found that organic foods are no more nutritious than their conventional counterparts. With headlines like "Stanford Scientists Cast Doubt on Advantages of Organic Meat and Produce", consumers were presumably left to conclude that buying organic was pointless at best and a waste of money at worst.

Perhaps this made for good headlines, but it makes for terrible common sense.

Lots of voices sprang up to defend organic agriculture. I won’t rehash all the arguments, but you can check out a great compilation here.

Put simply, the focus on health advantages in nutrient density terms largely misses the point. While more study is certainly needed on the relative antioxidant and nutritional profiles of organic vs. conventional foods, the biggest difference between the two is in how they are produced—and that is intimately tied with their impacts on our health. (As the study itself concluded, organic food is far less likely to be contaminated with pesticides and antibiotic-resistant bacteria. But more on that in just a bit).

It’s easy to be confused about what exactly separates organically produced food from its conventional analogue. So here’s the scoop. The USDA’s organic standards center around a list of approved and prohibited inputs for organic production, which means that organic foods must be produced without the use of:
antibiotics
artificial growth hormones
high fructose corn syrup
artificial dyes (made from coal tar and petrochemicals)
artificial sweeteners
synthetically created chemical pesticide and fertilizers
genetically engineered proteins and ingredients
sewage sludge
irradiation

I don’t know about you, but I consider my exposure to pesticide residues and “superbugs” (antibiotic-resistant bacteria that breed within our dominant conventional livestock production system) to be pretty important to my health, not to mention the health of farmworkers. But on both counts the study’s authors offered this anemic conclusion: “Consumption of organic foods may reduce exposure to pesticide residues and antibiotic-resistant bacteria.”

Let’s start with a basic finding that the paper then minimizes. Organic fruits and vegetables are far less likely to be contaminated with pesticide residues. This is significant even before you consider the differences in the extent of the contamination.

Tom Philpott and Dr. Charles (Chuck) Benbrook do a fantastic job of breaking down and critiquing the Stanford report’s treatment of pesticides. Benbrook has served a lifetime as an agriculture expert, including as the Executive Director of the Subcommittee of the House Committee on Agriculture with jurisdiction over pesticide regulation, research, trade and foreign agricultural issues. Philpott is an independent investigative journalist and cofounder of a non-profit center for sustainable food education. As they both point out, conventional produce is much more likely to be contaminated with multiple pesticides, more toxic pesticides, and at higher levels. The paper minimizes this difference because the pesticide residue levels are below EPA’s maximum allowed limits. But as they both note, the “cocktail effect” of the chemical mixtures is not taken into account by the EPA in setting the limits.

Most notably, Philpott and Benbrook point out the authors’ omission of the body of science focused on pre-natal and children’s exposures to highly toxic organophosphate pesticides, which are so dangerous to children’s health that they are no longer legal for use in homes or on residential lawns. NRDC has been working to ban them from agriculture because of the high number of human poisonings they cause each year, as well as their link to learning deficits in children exposed prenatally as a result of pregnant mothers being exposed.

Their conclusion? That the Stanford researchers dismissed statistically significant differences in the severity of pesticide contamination between conventional and organic food.

Likewise, the authors focus on the presence of antibiotic-resistant bacteria on organic vs. conventional meats, missing the much larger public health crisis caused by an increase in antibiotic-resistant infections and conventional animal agriculture’s significant contribution to this pool of resistance.

In conventional factory farms, massive quantities of antibiotics are fed routinely at low levels to chickens, pigs, cows, and other animals we eat, to speed animal growth and compensate for filthy—and avoidable—conditions. This constant, low-level dosing of animals creates a dangerous breeding ground for “superbugs”, which escape in soil, air, and water that comes into contact with animal waste. Animal waste is allowed to be used as biosolid fertilizer on conventional (but not organic) produce where the superbugs make their way onto our vegetables and fish.

These “superbugs” can not only be found on the meat in our grocery stores, but antibiotic-resistant bacteria can swap resistance genes with each other, spreading resistance, including transfers from harmless bacteria to pathogenic bacteria. Multi-drug resistant infections, such as the life-threatening disease MRSA, are on the rise while the development of new antibiotics is coming to a standstill. Antibiotic use in livestock is part of the problem.

The Stanford report appears to downplay the connection between the use of non-therapeutic antibiotics in conventional livestock production and the rise of superbugs, concluding that farm use of antibiotics “may be related” to the problem of antibiotic resistance. But as my colleague Avi discussed here, there’s now a significant body of science that establishes that the use of antibiotics on livestock operations (and not just human use of antibiotics) contributes to the problem of antibiotic resistance in bacteria. The Centers for Disease Control has said that there is “strong scientific evidence of a link between antibiotic use in food animals and antibiotic resistance in humans.” The American Medical Association agrees:


“Antibiotics are one of the most useful and important medical advances in recent history. Their effectiveness, however, is being compromised by bacterial resistance, arising in part from excessive use of antibiotics in animal agriculture.”

Organic meat producers, on the other hand, are not allowed to use antibiotics and so do not contribute to this problem. Instead of dosing their animals with drugs to prevent them from getting sick in unsanitary environments, these farmers find better ways of managing their flocks and preventing illness—for example, using better feed and cleaner housing.

Last, but certainly not least, it is the substantial environmental benefits that organic farming brings, from better management of soils to reduced fertilizer runoff into watersheds, that represent a key reason to support it. An analysis of the lifecycle impacts of conventional agriculture—from the pesticides discussed above, to nitrogen fertilizer and chemical herbicides—on farmworkers and surrounding communities, and on our soils, watersheds, air, and biodiversity shows that organic practices are better for our health, animal health, and environmental protection compared with conventional farming.

Let’s not confuse media buzz and sensational headlines with reality. Supporting organic agriculture for our health and the health of our environment is just common sense. For more information, check out some of these great posts on NRDC’s work to curb the use of toxic pesticides and non-therapeutic antibiotics in agriculture.
Original Article Here

Tuesday, 4 September 2012

The development of organic agriculture in Colombia

Organic agriculture in Colombia has opportunities that can leverage large, medium and small producers, but to achieve this, the public and private sectors should arrange medium term policies.

This was explained by an expert from the American Institute for Cooperation on Agriculture (IICA), Pedro Cussianovich, in a presentation to the Fourth Congress of Sustainable Rural Development that closed on August 15 in Colombia and attracted over 700 people.

Cussianovich who is in charge of the area of ​​organic agriculture in the IICA and serves as Technical Secretary of the American Commission for Organic Agriculture, clarified that a concerted policy agenda should promote social inclusion of producers and consumers in the activity by developing local markets as well as the positioning of Colombian products in international markets.

According to him, Colombia has the advantage that it already has excellent experience on the issue.

Organic production: an economical and commercial option for the development of Palmyra. Cussianovich addressed the issue from a perspective of market opportunity in front of his current local and national situation.

With 23% of certified organic land in the world and 17% of certified organic producers (2010), Latin America is building a new production and trade stage in the face of organic agriculture, from which Colombia greatly benefit, said the specialist, who performs his duties from Costa Rica, where IICA has its headquarters for the Americas.

Cussianovich was emphatic in stating that the determining factor will be to think and act strategically, because, to date, the development model followed by organic activity in the countries of the region, has been characterized more by individual actions than articulated and agreed actions.

The conference held in Palmira said, allowed to develop clear messages for a particular territory, but whose recommendations are extended to a country that has in their lands ability to respond to emerging market demands and deficit, who see in organic products a new consumer trend to ensure better health and a better quality of life for its residents.

Source: IICA

Original Article Here

Saturday, 18 August 2012

Zimbabwe: Agriculture in Darkness


IT is one of the world's fastest growing agro-businesses that developed from zero in 1990 to a US$55 billion industry in 2009.
It has the potential of cutting by half Zimbabwe's fertiliser use and energy bill. It can also completely eliminate the country's use of agro-chemicals many of which are currently being blamed for global warming through their green house effect on climatic conditions.
While organic farming is as lucrative and attractive as it gets to any economy anchored on agriculture, Zimbabwe seems to be the least interested in the technology being driven by new global demands for foods free from manufactured chemicals as major food consumers of the developed world increasingly shy away from genetically modified foods (GMOs).
"The problem is that there is an information gap. People don't have the correct information," said Fortunate Nyakanda, the Zimbabwe Organic Producers and Promoters Association director.
"If people have the correct information and extension services support then organic farming would grow in the country," added Nyakanda whose organisation is currently working with a mere 37 farmers groups, 32 of which are in Mashonaland East province.
Largely relying on crop rotation, green manure, compost and biological pest control, organic farming is a growing worldwide movement that has, for instance, seen organic food and beverages growth in the United States rise from US$1 billion in the early 1990s to US$26,7 billion in 2010 according to the Organic Trade Association's 2011 Organic Industry Survey.
The World Organic Agriculture, which monitors and documents developments in global organic agriculture, also says global organic sales reached US$54,9 billion in 2009, a 7,3 percent increase on the 2008 figure of US$50,9 billion.
Driving this industry are declining global food supplies, climate change and rising agricultural input costs.
"Industrial agriculture is a root cause of lack of food availability due to its reliance on foreign aid, external agricultural inputs and food imports that require a cash economy," the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements asserts, adding: "Industrial agricultural is not about feeding the world but maximising profits by producing commodities for whichever global market pays the most. This is the reason why one billion people in the developing world are chronically hungry and why over a billion people in developed countries are obese and suffering from diet-related diseases."
Zimbabweans are among the world's one billion hungry people and this year 1,7 million people need food assistance after the country experienced a severe mid-season dry spell that affected more than a third of the nation's stable maize crop.
Although the country has been experiencing poor harvests since 2000 largely due to incessant droughts and a chaotic land reform programme, poor input supplies of especially artificial fertilisers has also greatly affected yields in small holder farming communities who have been failing to raise enough capital for inputs owing to the country's illiquidity. Given Zimbabwe's precarious position summed up by a poorly performing economy sinking under a US$10 billion foreign debt and high food import bill, organic agriculture offers an enticing escape route.
The growing demand for organic foods in Europe and North America could partly help to quickly heal the country's damaged economic spine of agriculture especially given the fact that the frosty relations between Zimbabwe and the European Union (EU) are thawing.
"The EU is Zimbabwe's second largest trading partner and trade figures have doubled since 2009," the head of EU Delegation in Zimbabwe, Aldo Dell'Aricia said recently addressing the country's captains of industry.
"In 2011, the total trade figures with Zimbabwe amounted to €675 million, around US$870 million, with a positive trade balance of €212 million, around US$276 million, in favour of Zimbabwe. In 2011, Zimbabwe exported to the EU €444 million, around US$577 million, and imported from the EU goods for a total value of €232 million, around US$301 million.
"The figures show an increase of 46 percent of Zimbabwe's exports to the EU and an increase of 20,38 percent of Zimbabwe imports from the EU. The total trade increased around 36 percent from 2010 to 2011. This shows a recovery trend initiated in 2010 and the normalisation of trading relations after the hyperinflation period," said Dell'Aricia.
Through economic partnership agreements (EPAs), the EU has also introduced a duty free quota free (DFQF) of all goods to the EU market, tariffs that will gradually be eliminated over the next 15 years, a period long enough for Zimbabwe to stand on its own feet particularly since the country is one of Africa's most promising emerging economies.
"As EU is a traditional importer of minerals, agricultural products and other raw materials that are produced by Zimbabwe, EPAs will stimulate the exports increasing by the making use DFQF access to the EU that remains Zimbabwe's major trading partner," said the EU head of delegation.
Major organic markets included Germany, France, Denmark, Switzerland and Austria.
Leading organic farming countries include Australia, Germany, Argentina, China, Brazil, Uruguay, Spain and the United Kingdom.
According to the web-based research engine, Wikipedia, organic crops yielded much better than conventional crops and withstand severe weather conditions than conventional crops.
"Contrary to widespread belief, organic farming can build up soil organic matter better than conventional no-till farming, which suggests long-term yield benefits from organic farming," writes Wikipedia adding: "The decreased cost of synthetic fertiliser and pesticide inputs, along with the higher prices that consumers pay for organic produce, contribute to increased profits. Organic farms have been consistently found to be as or more profitable than conventional farms."
According to the United Nations Environmental Programme and the United Nations Conference on Trade and Development organic agriculture can be more conducive to food security in Africa than most conventional production systems, and that it is more likely to be sustainable in the long-term and that yields had more than doubled where organic, or near-organic practices had been used while soil fertility and drought resistance improved.
 Original Article Here

Thursday, 12 July 2012

Organic Agriculture Movement Set To Unveil 'Green Village'


THE JAMAICA Organic Agriculture Movement (JOAM) intends to make its presence felt and seen in a tangible way at the annual Denbigh Agricultural, Industrial and Food Show where it will unveil its 'Green Village'.
The 'green village' is a concept centred on highlighting organic farming and other activities showcasing greening activities.
The group, which copped the 2012 award for sustainable agriculture at the recent Jamaica Environment Trust Environmental Action Awards ceremony, will use the opportunity to present a working model of its, "vision for a different Jamaica". However, to make this a reality, JOAM is seeking the participation of individuals and companies to buy into the concept and use the village to showcase their products and activities in presenting this different face of agriculture.
Chair of JOAM Dorienne Rowan-Campbell offered some insight into the green village: "We are in the process of organising a children's learning and activity area; a greening-issues centre with speakers, videos and musicians; a showplace for the winners of the Jamaica Environment Trust's Schools Awards; a kitchen sponsored by Cameron Industries, where we will invite people to buy and sample organic foods, and a 'green smith' who makes agro-processing machinery using recycled materials."
She is optimistic that each visitor to the village will leave with a positive impression of the organic lifestyle. After entering, they will travel along a trail, with the first stop being a model farm where composting, crop rotation, nursery management, water harvesting and beekeeping will be among the activities on show.
The next stop is a five-booth area where JOAM members from the various regions will showcase their produce and work. In Westmoreland, the Bluefields organic group has been working with the Rural Agricultural Development Authority to develop sorrel wine and sorrel jam, while in St Thomas they have been working on lemon grass by-products such as soaps.
The next stop is the activity area which will have two sections, and the idea is that persons should be able to engage in discussions on topical issues and leave enlightened. Another section will have a kitchen where organic produce will be prepared.
Rowan-Campbell explained that the range of interactive and other activities will cater to every age group: "This section leads to a meet-and-greet gazebo by a pond, where persons can share the organic lifestyle.
Organisers of the Jamaica Agricultural Society (JAS) have promised a special show this year, which runs from August 4-6 with a range of activities in keeping with the celebration of Jamaica's 50th year of Independence.
To display your produce in the JOAM village at Denbigh 2012 or learn more, contact Roy Page by calling 390-5382, or email atjoma@joamltd.org or check out the website at www.joamltd.org.
christopher.serju@gleanerjm.com
Original Article Here

Wednesday, 11 July 2012

Organic Farming Criticism


There are mixed feelings from conventional farmers and the agricultural industry about organic farming. Many in the industry are not convinced organic foods are more nutritious or that organic methods trump scientific advances, citing for example that farming with Genetically Modified Organisms (GMOs) to help lessen world hunger outweighs any potential environmental risk.
Restricted use of antibiotics in organic farming has led to concern about high levels ofmicrobes in manure, in turn causing food poisoning such asE. coli. There is a lack of sufficient evidence to prove organics suffer from a higher than conventional level of microbes, but right now studies favor organic products. The Soil Association suggests the handling of manures on organic farms are actually more likely to reduce levels of organisms, and that less than 5 percent of food poisoning outbreaks are due to fruit and vegetable contamination. Research continues to be conducted on the use of organic waste in all types of farming.
Additionally, a report in 2002 suggests organic and free-range chickens might be more likely to have Campylobacter infections, a known cause of food poisoning. Subsequent studies are underway.
Even as organic farming methods work to protect the environment by building healthy soils and emphasizing natural systems, without proper management and knowledge, organic practices can create pathogen problems.
The environmental benefits of organic farming are a hotly debated topic, and researchers continue to study how sustainable methods may help cure -- or at least help negate -- some of the effects of any environmental hazards produced by the modern-day agricultural system, hopefully reducing levels of chemicals put into the soil and atmosphere and our bodies. Conventional wisdom follows that the more we understand about our food sources and how they affect our bodies and the environment, the better.
Original Article Here

Wednesday, 13 June 2012

Agricultural Secretary Vilsack: Farm Exports Are Creating Jobs and Growing the Rural Economy


DES MOINES, Iowa, –Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack met with business and community leaders to discuss how continuing demand for American food and agricultural products abroad has led to the three best consecutive years for U.S. farm exports in our nation's history. Vilsack said the success of American agriculture is a positive economic story that is creating jobs in rural America and benefitting people around the world. Vilsack also highlighted a report released this week by the White House Rural Council and the U.S. Department of Agriculture which notes progress that has been made in the agricultural economy and details steps the Obama Administration has taken to help strengthen the farm economy and support jobs in rural America.

"In 2010, President Obama committed to doubling U.S. exports in five years, and just two years later, we are on pace to meet that goal," said Vilsack. "Meanwhile, people around the world continue to demand U.S. food and agricultural products, boosting American businesses and supporting our rural communities. To ensure these successes continue, USDA has aggressively worked to expand export opportunities and reduce barriers to trade. Less restrictions abroad, stronger trade deals for U.S. agriculture, and greater export assistance for U.S. businesses supports more than 1 million Americans jobs in industries from packing and shipping, to food processing, to transportation. This is an American-made success story worth sharing with our friends, family and neighbors."

Speaking to business leaders in Iowa, one of the nation's most productive agricultural economies, Vilsack pointed to the state's low unemployment rate of 5.1 percent as proof of agriculture's success story. Last year, Iowa exported a record $7 billion in agricultural products, which supported nearly 60,000 jobs on and off the farm. Thus far in 2012, the state's farm exports show a 15-percent gain over last year's record total.

Vilsack also highlighted a joint report released this week by the White House Rural Council and USDA, which notes how the President's National Export Initiative has opened new markets for U.S. agricultural products and services and contributed to a historic level of agricultural exports. Other highlights from the report include:
• Innovation: Innovation in U.S. agriculture has kept America's farms among the most productive in the world. U.S. farm sector income reached a nominal record of $98.1 billion in 2011. Adjusting for general inflation, real farm income in 2011 recorded its 3rd highest level in the last 50 years.
• Clean Energy: The Administration has pursued polices that promote domestic energy alternatives like biofuels, bioenergy, and wind power to provide new opportunities for farmers, ranchers, and forest managers. Pursuit of an all-of-the-above clean energy and energy efficiency strategy saved Americans a projected 6.5 billion kWh - enough energy to power over 590,000 homes for a year - and nearly doubled the amount of installed wind energy generation in the U.S. over the past three years from about 25,000 MW in 2008 to 47,000 MW in 2011.
New Industries: The Administration has supported new industry diversification within the agricultural economy. The retail value of the organic industry grew to $31.4 billion in 2011, up from $21.1 billion in 2008. The number of operations certified organic grew by 1,109 - or more than 6% - between 2009 and 2011.
• Community Investment: The rural economy has been strengthened by investments in over 6,250 new community facilities. Additionally, over the last three years, 12,000 USDA grants and loans have been issued to assist over 50,000 rural small businesses.

Just a few weeks ago, USDA forecast 2012 farm exports to reach the second highest level on record, after 2011, making the past three years the strongest collective performance in our nation's history. Today, only 1 percent of U.S. companies export, and yet 95 percent of the world's consumers live outside the borders of the United States, creating significant opportunities for U.S. food and agriculture.


Responding to that demand since 2009, U.S. farmers and ranchers have delivered three of the four highest levels of U.S. agricultural exports in American history. In fiscal year 2012, the latest forecast sees $134.5 billion in U.S. farm exports, the second highest level ever and $3.5 billion greater than the previous forecast. And Vilsack said he expects new trade agreements with South Korea, Panama and the European Union to deliver even greater returns for U.S. businesses.


Vilsack said USDA is committed to expanding export opportunities for all producers. When asked about outcomes of USDA's March trade mission to China—the department's largest trade mission to date—he highlighted that the delegation included 39 U.S. companies, representatives from six state departments of agriculture, and achieved nearly $2 million in immediate sales.


In terms of new agreements beyond South Korea and Colombia, Vilsack pointed out a recent, major partnership with the potential for substantial returns: the United States and European Union equivalency arrangement for organic agricultural goods. The U.S. and EU are the world's largest producers of organics, said Vilsack, and estimates show the market for U.S. organics sales to the EU could grow substantially within the first few years of this arrangement. Moreover, the arrangement will provide expanded market access, reduce duplicative requirements and reduce certification costs while protecting organic integrity.
Original Article Here

Tuesday, 15 May 2012

Africa: Benefits of Organic Agriculture in the Continent


BY: GETHSEMANI MWIZABI AND ANNIE SAMPA,
EXPANDING Africa's shift towards organic farming will be good for the continent's nutritional needs, the environment, farmers' incomes, African markets and employment.
United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD) Deputy Secretary-General Petko Draganov said this recently at the 2nd African Organic Conference in Lusaka Zambia.
The conference, attended by more than 300 participants from 40 countries, had the theme "Main-streaming organic agriculture into the African development agenda."
No doubt, organic agriculture can offer an impressive array of food security, economic, environmental, and health benefits for developing countries, especially in Africa.
It has been clear for some years that organic farming "fits" Africa. Organic agriculture does not use artificial fertiliser and other chemicals, which are expensive for the continent's farmers, as 90 per cent of these inputs are imported.
It preserves and enhances the soil in a region where land degradation and expanding deserts are a serious concern.
It relies primarily on locally available renewable resources, which shields farmers from price shocks associated with external farming inputs; it frequently increases farm yields by 100 per cent or more; and it brings higher prices to farmers, since organic produce sells at a premium.
In addition, it helps create jobs in rural regions - as organic inputs are usually produced locally - and helps to stem the tide of migrants from rural areas to African cities.
The UNCTAD strongly supports the growing use of organic farming practices on the continent.
Africa already has more certified organic farms than any other continent - and noted that this form of agriculture comprehensively illustrates the central topic of UNCTAD's just concluded quadrennial conference in Doha, Qatar: 'Development-centred globalisation: Towards inclusive and sustainable growth and development.'
Zambia's first Republican President Kenneth Kaunda, patron of Organic Producers and Processers Association of Zambia (OPPAZ) said "Organic agriculture is extremely important in human life".
The former head of State who is passionate about organic foods, encouraged the country to engage in organic agriculture.
The conference emphasised the importance of food security, sustainable agriculture, and a transition towards a 'green' economy.
It had among its objectives the development of an African Organic Action Plan intended to spur expansion of the organic farming sector, streamline certification and "organic equivalency" systems that allow more vigorous trade in organic goods, and add to the continent's markets for organic produce.
Organic agriculture in Africa is growing rapidly. More than one million hectares of arable land and at least 530,000 farmers are certified according to organic standards in Africa.
Uganda and Ethiopia have each more than 100,000 certified organic farms and Tanzania has some 85,000. Most of the certified organic production is sold for exports, but there are good organic markets in South Africa and Egypt and emerging markets in countries such as Senegal and Kenya. Many more farmers, from Morocco to Madagascar, from Cairo to Cape Town, practice organic farming.
OPPAZ chief executive officer Munshimbwe Chitalu who spoke on Ubuntu vis-à-vis organic agriculture, said Ubuntu under-pinned organic agriculture which is farming in harmony with nature for social justice and economic development in a sustained environment.
"Organic agriculture sustains the fertility of soils, ecosystems and the health of the people. It also relies on locally adapted improved ecological processes and cycles, and natural biodiversity. It is therefore important that farmers are encouraged to practice organic farming," said Zambia's Minister of Agriculture and Livestock Emmanuel Chenda when he officiated at the conference.
The three-day Lusaka meeting was organised by UNCTAD, Organic Producers and Processors Association of Zambia (OPPAZ), the African Union, the International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM), the Food and Agriculture Organisation of the United Nations (FAO) and Zambian Ministry of Agriculture and Livestock.
Yemi Akinbamijo, head of Agriculture and Food Security from African Union Commission said, "Africa is food deficient, which is why organic farming provides another way of improving food security on the continent."
Manjo Smith of International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) said one of the achievements of the conference was the establishment of the Southern African regional network that would continue focus on organics in the region adding that there is a lot of research being done on soil fertilisation which is very important for farmers.
She said governments should realise that this is important to get into policies, my hope is for policy makers and governments to understand that GMOs and chemical fertilisers is not an answer, we have seen that organic agriculture is the answer for us because it increases organic production and production of crops so much more in Africa. We can use the materials that we have available.
And FAO representative in Zambia on behalf of the UN Development System in Zambia said sustainable development has been a major issue on the agenda of the UN system.
"In view of the urgency that climate change is imposing on our communities and economies, we need to move into action beyond our good intentions, policies and conferences to stop resources degradation, wasteful consumption, negative habits and customs so that the future generations are not disadvantaged," said Ad Spijkers.
He said organic agriculture needs to be embraced in an integrated manner with climate change initiatives so that positive synergies are built, harnessed, sustained and improved for the good of our world and a better future.
Spijkers also stated that the UN Development System in Zambia is engaging the Zambian Government in pursuing a green economy through environmentally friendly farming practices and management of natural resources as "our agriculture system is getting into Climate Smart Agriculture with a focus on sustained and resilient production farming systems that have minimum environmental effect to produce food and create jobs."
At the end of the conference participants called on the European Union (EU) and other actors of the global trade partners to take all possible steps to facilitate the participation of Africa in global organic markets.
This includes a request to recognise as equivalent the East African Organic Products Standard (EAOPS), which was developed through a consultative regional public-private partnership and adopted as the official East African Community organic standard in 2007.
In what they called the Lusaka Declaration on Mainstreaming Organic Agriculture into the African Development Agenda, they also applauded efforts made by the growing number of member States that have embraced the concept of Organic Agriculture.
They urged African governments to include organic agriculture in their policies and programmes, in consultation with the organic/ecological agriculture stakeholders in their countries. The UNCTAD-UNEP "Best Practices for Organic Policy" (UNCTAD/DITC/TED/2007/3) can provide useful guidance.
They also came up with a six pillars of the African Organic Action Plan which are:
1. Research, training and extension: To conduct participatory, interdisciplinary, multi-cultural research that informs stakeholder training and offers appropriate knowledge and skills and innovative solutions to the community.
2. Information and communication: To develop information and communication strategies to sensitise the stakeholders and the general public on the value and practices of ecological organic agriculture.
3. Value chain and market development: To increase trade in ecological/organic products from Africa at domestic, regional and export markets.
4. Networking and partnership: To strengthen synergies among stakeholders and beneficiaries to support ecological organic agriculture through networks and partnerships.
5. Supportive policies and programmes: To support the development and implementation of enabling policies and programmes.
6. Institutional capacity development: To establish, develop and support ecological/organic agriculture institutions in Africa.
 Original article Here

Thursday, 10 May 2012

Is Organic Farming Better For The Environment ?


All countries around the world are dependent on agriculture to help them cater to their ever growing population. The agricultural sector gives employment to almost half of the world's population. Before the advent of technology, the only way that food was grown was through organic farming.
However, when technology started developing during the Second World War, it also had a dramatic effect on the agricultural sector. Conventional farming methods make use of chemical fertilizers, pesticides, mechanization and also genetic engineering all in the name of producing maximum yields. Also, many farmers are just growing a single crop instead of using crop rotation, and this causes soil erosion and strips the soil of its nutrients.
However, organic farming is beneficial not just for people who eat the produce, but also for the environment. Organic farming does not use chemicals and synthetic fertilizers to increase yield. Neither does it use genetic engineering. Instead, organic farming protects its crop by using natural methods of pest control, it uses crop rotation to prevent growth of weeds, it uses mulches to retain soil moisture and many more environmentally-friendly practices.
By using organic farming, soil erosion is reduced and the topsoil is retained. Crop rotation prevents the stripping of nutrients from the soil, and the fact chemicals are not used as fertilizers or pesticides, ensures that the produce is non-toxic and chemical-free. Above all, none of the chemicals finds their way into the ground water or water bodies thereby polluting the water sources. Also, organic farming helps to reduce carbon emissions and this helps to protect the changing global climate.
All these advantages of organic farming clearly show that organic farming does help the environment.

Organic Farming Methods


Farming methods that do not make use of chemicals, synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, genetic engineering and growth regulators are known as organic farming methods. The fact that organic farming is being pushed more by various environment protection agencies is because the methods used for cultivation helps to sustain the environment without wreaking more damage. Also, organic farming methods make best use of all the natural resources available.
There are different organic farming methods that can be used effectively to increase the productivity of the crops and still not make use of chemicals and synthetic materials. Some of the different organic farming methods are as follows:
The main aspect of organic farming is polyculture. Here the farmer cultivates a variety of crops on one single tract of land to ensure that the soil is not stripped off its nutrients. In addition, polyculture also helps to attract a variety of microbes to the soil, ensuring the soil always is rich in nutrients.
Organic farmers do not use synthetic fertilizers to increase the fertility of the soil. Instead they opt for green manure like compost. Some organic farmers first grow a crop of leafy plants, and then bury them in the soil just prior to the main crop is sown. These leafy plants add nutrients and organic matter to the soil which responsible for keeping the main crop to grow well and healthy.
An important aspect of farming is controlling pests. Organic farmers do not use pesticides or chemicals to get rid of pests. Instead they encourage beneficial insects, or grow other plants that repel pests. Also, many organic farmers plant disease resistant plants. If pests do invade the plants, then biological pesticides like neem or essential oils are used to get rid of them.
Organic farming is all about sustainable farming so that the ecosystem is well balanced and maintained. This means that the farmer uses everything to preserve the soil nutrients and ensuring that the soil can nourish the plants for prolonged periods of time.

Saturday, 5 May 2012

Organic Agriculture


ORGANIC AGRICULTURE
ORGANIC AGRICULTURE. Organic agriculture originated as a response to a growing awareness that the health of the land is linked to the health and future of the people. It is a holistic and philosophical approach to agriculture, which has as its goals the protection and conservation of the land for future generations, the production of high-quality food, the return to many traditional agricultural methods, and the harmonious balance with a complex series of ecosystems. Land, water, plants, animals, and people are all seen as interlinked and interdependent.
Definition
The final rule of the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA), which implements the Organic Foods Production Act of 1990, describes organic production as one which will "respond to site-specific conditions by integrating cultural, biological and mechanical practices that foster cycling of resources, promote ecological balance and conserve biodiversity." Organic agriculture promotes linkages and connections between land and water, plants and people. Soil fertility is enhanced through the use of composted waste to be generated at the farm site and recycled into it, multiple crops and rotations, a belief in the beneficial results of encouraging biodiversity through numerous species, and no use of synthetic fertilizers or pesticides. Further, stringent inspections, record keeping, and certifications are required to verify and maintain the organic status of the land and the food produced.
The terms "alternative," "sustainable," and "ecological" agriculture are also sometimes used, in place of organic, although not everyone believes that these terms are interchangeable. The European Union protects three terms: "organic," "ecological," and "biological" and abbreviations like "bio" and "eco" in all European Union languages. This is to prevent their use in a misleading or false manner. In the United States, the definition of organic agriculture by the National Organic Standards Board is "an ecological production management system that promotes and enhances biodiversity, biological cycles and soil biological activity. It is based on the minimal use of off-farm inputs and on management practices that restore, maintain, and enhance ecological harmony."
Today, organic agriculture is practiced in almost every country in the world, and the amount of certified organic land is growing as well. The total area is more than 42 million acres worldwide. The bulk of the organic land (45 percent) is in Oceania; Europe has 25 percent; North America, almost 8 percent; and Latin America, 22 percent. The emphasis in organic agriculture is on sustainability, local resources, and the stewardship of the environment, as well as expanding its global impact beyond food supply and into ecological health. Economically, the International Trade Center estimates the world retail market for organic food and beverages increased from $10 billion in 1997 to $17.5 billion in 2000. Revenue distribution by 2001 is estimated to be at 46 percent in Europe and 37 percent in the United States.
History
At the beginning of the twentieth century, 39 percent of the United States population lived on farms, compared with less than 2 percent in 1990. Large land holdings were designed as federal lands to protect the natural environment and provide public access. Food quality, adequacy of supply, and public health were concerns. Issues with food quality led to the Pure Food and Drug Act of 1906. Extensive research was carried out to make plants disease resistant, and to improve yield. In the 1920s Rudolf Steiner, an extremely charismatic and complex individual, gave a series of eight lectures about agriculture that were the foundation of biodynamics, a concept in which all life forms and the land are in balance and combine with agriculture to address the health of the land with a spiritual dimension. By the 1930s hybrid seed corn had became common, and the devastation of the dust storms destroyed millions of acres of farmland in the Plains states. Two world wars had decimated farms and farmlands in much of Europe. Food supply for present and future populations was becoming a global concern. The vitality of the soil was seen by many as the key to a healthy future population.
Sir Albert Howard of England was one of the visionary leaders, if not the founder, of the organic agricultural movement in Europe. Philosophically, he linked the health of the land to the health of the people. Howard believed that agriculture as mainly practiced, with chemical fertilizers and a single crop, was out of balance with the environment and that many traditional agricultural practices should be revived. His major concern was for the health of the soil, which he felt could be maintained by a diversity of plant and animal crops, recycling of waste to enrich the soil, minimal depth in plowing, natural pest control, and smaller labor-intensive farms, emulating traditional methods.
By the 1940s, chemical fertilizers and pesticide and insecticide use had increased. However, a USDA report from the same time warned that insecticides were present in food and advocated the use of naturally occurring products as insecticides. Some believed that conservation practices like cover crops, crop rotation, strip planting, and contouring of the planting were critical to preserve the soil both by keeping it in place and by maintaining its fertility. At the same time, conventional farming was stressing yields, mechanization, and modern practices. In 1949, official guidance was issued from the U.S. government on how to appraise the toxicity of chemicals in foods.
In America, J. I. Rodale had founded Organic Gardening Magazine and the Soil and Health Foundation (now the Rodale Institute). Many credit him from the mid-1940s onward with promoting and supporting organic agriculture in America. He went on to create numerous publications and with his research and publishing delivered his core message of "healthy soil = healthy food = healthy people."
In 1959, the cranberry crop in the United States was recalled due to the presence of a cancer-causing chemical used to kill weeds. In 1962, Rachel Carson's work Silent Spring had a massive impact: Many Americans, for the first time, saw the link between the loss of plant and animal populations and the use of pesticides. By that time organic farming was well established as an alternative approach. Further environmental activism in the 1970s made many aware of organic agriculture and organic foods.
Alice Waters opened her restaurant Chez Panisse in Berkeley in 1971 and has been a promoter and champion of quality ingredients, supporting growers who farm organically. Her influence in turn promoted and sustained many other organic growers. The fame and growing impact of Chez Panisse have affected chefs and the public alike. Numerous chefs today provide details about ingredients on their menu, and many base their entire approach to food on organic products.
Likewise, vegetarians have long focused on the quality of the ingredients in their diet. John and Karen Hess in their landmark book The Taste of America decried the quality of food in America in the 1970s, stating that "[t]he health food and organic movements and the counterculture generally, have made some small but enormously promising steps toward reviving the taste of our food. . . . They are our hope" (p. 298). Organic agricul ture has slowly grown, spurred by various scares but hampered by the counterculture label. Reports and findings in the 1990s with regard to the effect of pesticides and chemicals in food on humans, particularly children (for example, the use of alar on apples), drove the increasing demand for organically produced food, which in turn spurred the growth of organic farms.
Application of Principles
Although many people associate organic agriculture primarily with fruits and vegetables, organic agricultural practices are applied effectively to all crops and animals. All cropsgrains, citrus, nuts, fruits, herbs, vegetables, oilseeds like flax and sunflower, beans, cotton, grasses for pasturelandcan reinforce a basic organic tenet: grow a variety of crops in a rotation system. Many people prefer organic agriculture because of its systemic approach that ties food production to ecology, and connects land, people, plants, and animals to a common goal, a healthy vital environment for all. Food produced organically is thought to be more flavorful, have higher nutritional values, be safer to eat, and be ecologically sound. Each food safety crisis, environmental scare, and dietary concern has increased the steadily growing pool of organic farmers and consumers.
The founders of the organic agricultural movementRodale, Balfour, and Howard, to name a fewpassionately shared the belief that the health and vitality of the soil were key to the future of the land and food production. A fundamental principle of organic agriculture is that no synthetic fertilizers or pesticides are permitted. Complex ecosystems that encourage a rich diversity of plants, animals, and insects are considered necessary for a viable and living soil. Composting, worms and beneficial insects in the environment, recycled farm wastes, use of manures, composts, ash, and crop residues contribute to the vitality of the soil, which in turn leads to healthy plants and animals. Further, organic agriculture addresses the broader environmental issues of pesticide and fertilizer residues, run-offs, and concentrations, which affect, not just the health of the organic farm system, but the ecosystems around it. The concept of balance between nature and human actions and stewardship of the land is integral to organic agriculture; in fact, it cannot be maintained otherwise. The inspection process leading to organic certification usually requires a minimum of three years in the United States (two years in the United Kingdom) to allow all traces of past land use practices to disappear. The first usable harvest follows the third year, assuming all other criteria are met for organic certification. This sizable commitment of resources is economically difficult and is one reason that many countries, although not the United States, have subsidies to help farmers certify their land for organic production.
Many feel strongly that organic foods, which are grown without synthetic pesticides, eliminate the concern for ingesting the residues or additives.
Organic Foods
Most consumers believe, and some studies have shown, that there are more nutrients and flavor in organic products. Generally, organic products are more costly than foods grown by conventional agriculture. They are more labor intensive and must meet much stricter regulation, and therefore the cost of organic foods reflects the cost of production. Organic agricultural practices, which utilize local resources and eliminate outside needs as much as possible, fit developing countries' needs very well as well as countries with food supply issues, for example, Cuba.
Cuba is considered one of the success stories of organic agriculture. Heavily dependent upon the Soviets for food and agricultural support, the collapse of the former USSR in 1989 left Cuba desperate for food. Over-night, supplies of synthetic fertilizers and pesticides and mechanized equipment all disappeared. Urban spaces were turned into gardens, plot sizes decreased, and organic practices were followed, as there was no alternative. The results have been dramatic, both in creating a new career for many and dramatically changing both the diet of the population and the appearance of Cuba. Now many people have access to fresh organic foods and unused land is turned to food production. Over one-half million tons of food were grown in Havana alone in 1998.
Before the 1990 Organic Foods Production Act, Title XXI of the Food, Agriculture, Conservation, and Trade Act of 1990, many state and other organizations certified organic production. The 1990 rules, published in December of 2000 after a decade in development, review, and revisions, set national standards for certification of agricultural products as organic. Certification for all but the smallest growers and compliance for all agricultural products sold under these standards must be completed by late 2002. Certain practices and types of substances, like synthetic fertilizers and pesticides, are prohibited. The use of the word "organic" is now nationally regulated. In the United States, a raw or processed product labeled "100 percent organic" must contain only organic ingredients, although it can contain water and salt; if labeled "organic" it must be at least 95 percent organic and if labeled "made with organic ingredients" it must have at least 70 percent organic ingredients. Both the "100 percent organic" and "organic" designations can use an approved "USDA Organic" seal and penalties can be levied if there is any deliberate misrepresentation.
Land under Organic Cultivation
In 1997, 1.3 million acres in forty-nine states were certified organic, and although this number had more than doubled in the 1990s, certified organic land still represents just 0.2 percent of all cultivated land (828 million acres). These totals include crop, range, and pasture lands. All indicators are that the amount of certified organic land is increasing rapidly, however. For example, in California, certified organic acreage increased by 38 percent between 1995 and 1997 and in Washington it increased by 150 percent between 1997 and 1999. The highest production crops that are certified organic are corn and wheat, although thirty-five states are producing a variety of certified organic grains. Tomatoes, lettuce, and carrots are the primary organic vegetables, with about 48,227 acres in organic vegetable production (in 1997); grapes produced on 39 percent of the acreage and apples on 18 percent of the certified organic farm land account for about 2 percent of the certified land that is devoted to producing these crops. Organic herbs are grown in thirty-two states; three states have certified specific land for harvesting wild herbs.
Prior to this national legislation for organic certification, organic land certification was given by over 40 organizations, which included twelve state programs. For example, California grew almost half of all certified organic vegetables in 1997; vegetable farming in Vermont, which has been promoting organics for 30 years, was 24 percent organic. Many states have started to develop incentives for organic conversion.
Sales
Most organic farms are about one-third the size of the conventional farm and average about 140 acres. Organic vegetables are generally grown on even smaller holdings, with the majority less than 10 acres in size. They are frequently marketed directly to the consumer primarily through farmers' markets and restaurant chefs, accounting for 3 percent of total organic sales. A very popular form of direct marketing is subscription farming, sometimes known as CSA, an innovative way of connecting the consumer directly with the farm and crop. In 1998, there were 2,746 farmers' markets operating in the United States. Natural food stores, long a source for all organic products, recorded sales of $4 billion in 1999, and an annual sales growth rate of at least 20 percent. Total retail sales of all organic products are estimated at $7.8 billion in 2000, and $833 million of fresh organic fruits and vegetables were sold in natural food stores in 1999.
Organic Agriculture Worldwide
On a global level, in Europe, Japan, the United States, and the United Kindom, retail organic food and beverage sales accounted for about 2 percent of the total, about $13 billion in 1998, with an anticipated annual growth rate of 20 percent.
In 2001, Canada reported of 246,923 farms, 2,230 produced certified organic products, and 614 of these, or 27.5 percent, produced fruits, vegetables, or greenhouse products. Nearly fifteen hundred farms, or 64.7 percent, reported organic field crops. In Canada, the formation of the Land Fellowship in Ontario in the 1950s provided the foundation of the organic farming movement. As in the United States, these early visionaries were joined in the 1970s by a host of individuals and organizations whose concerns for the environmental health of the planet made an immediate linkage to the principles of organic agriculture. Numerous organizations, like the Canadian Organic Advisory Board, which is composed of volunteers, promote and support organic agriculture in a variety of ways throughout the provinces. Canada's National Standard for Organic Agriculture is a voluntary standard for organic production, whose principles and practices focus on protection of environmental biodiversity, a comprehensive and systematic use of organic practices for the production of foods, and a verification process to ensure the standards are met.
Sir Albert Howard is not the only founder of the early organic movement in the United Kingdom to have a global impact. Lord Walter Northbourne is credited with creating the phrase "organic farming" in his 1940 book Look to the Land, and Lady Evelyn Balfour, whose book The Living Soil was based on years of comparative farming data, inspired many to support the principles of organic agriculture put forward by Howard. Lady Balfour was also involved in the founding of the Soil Association in the United Kingdom in 1946. The Soil Association remains an active advocacy group for organic standards. Throughout the United Kingdom, there is a wide range of organizations, government ministries, colleges, and research centers focused on research, education, advocacy, and sustaining organic agricultural practices. The first organic standards were published by the Soil Association. The group performs the majority of the inspections, although several other approved inspection groups also perform certification inspections.
In the United Kingdom there were 2,865 licensed organic farmers in production, or in conversion, in 2000, a dramatic increase from the 828 listed in 1997. In late 1999, 2 percent of all agricultural land (a little over 1 million acres) was farmed organically (fully organic or in conversion). Organic vegetable production value for 1999 was $28.8 million in the United Kingdom. Nearly half of the consumers interviewed said they bought organic produce for the taste.
The Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations (FAO) has published the Codex Alimentarius to establish global food standards and guidelines for organically produced foods. The FAO states:
Foods should only refer to organic production methods if they come from an organic farm system employing management practices which seek to nurture ecosystems which achieve sustainable productivity and provide weed, pest and disease control though a diverse mix of mutually dependent life forms, recycling plant and animal residues, crop selection and rotation, water management, tillage, and cultivation. Soil fertility is maintained and enhanced by a system which optimizes soil biological activity and the physical and mineral nature of the soil as the means to provide a balanced nutrient supply for plant and animal life as well as to conserve soil resources. Production should be sustainable with the recycling of plant nutrients as an essential part of the fertilizing strategy. Pest and disease management is attained by means of the encouragement of a balanced host/predator relationship, augmentation of beneficial insect populations, biological and cultural control and mechanical removal of pests and affected plant parts.
In Europe, the European Union countries have a total of 10 million acres held in 145,113 organic farms, which represent about 2 percent of farms and about 3 percent of the farming acreage. This figure represents a rapid rate of growth, about 25 percent over the last ten years in European Union member countries. For example, as of 2001, France had over 10,000 organic farms, an increase of 12 percent from the previous year. Ongoing research in organic agriculture is being conducted in most countries, and some have adopted educational programs that support the organic farmers as well as the consumers. Uniformity of standards and dissemination of research are critical to the future of organic agriculture. The International Federation of Organic Agriculture Movements (IFOAM) was founded in 1972 to coordinate research and represent organic agriculture worldwide in forums for policy and law. Currently, IFOAM is working in 100 countries with more than 690 member organizations. Perhaps most important, it sets, maintains, and revises the IFOAM Basic Standards of Organic Agriculture and Food Processing, which are translated into eighteen languages and ensure the quality of and equal application of the organic certification through the IFOAM Accreditation Programme.
Courtesy encyclopedia

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...