Showing posts with label disaster. Show all posts
Showing posts with label disaster. Show all posts

Wednesday, 12 September 2012

No surprises for agriculture in 'no frills' Queensland Budget

Queensland's Liberal National Party Government has delivered its first Budget.

Mining royalties and the gambling tax will rise and stamp duty on properties worth over $1 million will also increase.

Natural disaster reconstruction work will peak this year, with $1.9 billion being spent on road works.

10,600 public servants will be made redundant as the government sheds 14,000 staff.

Treasurer Tim Nicholls says the Budget will return the state to an operating surplus in 2013-14.

Sugar lobby group Canegrowers has welcomed what it says is the Newman Government's renewed Budget focus on agriculture, research and development.

CEO Steve Greenwood says the industry always knew the Budget would be tight, but it does appreciate the government honouring key pre-election commitments.

AgForce's incoming president Ian Burnett says the increase in stamp duty for properties worth more than $1 million wasn't especially welcome and the lack of other big funding announcements was expected.

"We are one of the pillars, we're looking for agriculture to expand, but we understand and support that finances have to get back on track first."

The Queensland Farmers Federation says the budget shows a step toward positive reform for the agricultural sector, but also serves as the opportunity for the LNP to now show a more substantial plan for the farmers of Queensland.

The horticulture industry is taking its time to examine the details of the Budget before making comment.

Fishing industry representatives also asked for more time to consider the details before commenting on the commitment to spend $10 million over two years to safeguard marine resources.
Original Article Here

Saturday, 1 September 2012

SBA Economic Injury Disaster Loans Available in Kentucky Following Secretary of Agriculture Disaster Declaration for Drought By U.S. Small Business Administration

By U.S. Small Business Administration

ATLANTA, Aug. 31, 2012 -- /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- The U.S. Small Business Administration announced today that federal economic injury disaster loans are available to small businesses, small agricultural cooperatives, small businesses engaged in aquaculture and most private non-profit organizations of all sizes located in the counties of Breckinridge, Hardin and Meade in Kentucky as a result of the drought that occurred between July 3 and August 27, 2012.

(Logo: http://photos.prnewswire.com/prnh/20110909/DC65875LOGO)

"When the Secretary of Agriculture issues a disaster declaration to help farmers recover from damages and losses to crops, the Small Business Administration issues a declaration to eligible entities affected by the same disaster," said Frank Skaggs, director of SBA's Field Operations Center East in Atlanta.

Under this declaration, the SBA's Economic Injury Disaster Loan program is available to eligible farm-related and nonfarm-related entities that suffered financial losses as a direct result of this disaster. With the exception of aquaculture enterprises, SBA cannot provide disaster loans to agricultural producers, farmers, or ranchers. Nurseries are eligible to apply for economic injury disaster loans for losses caused by drought conditions.

The loan amount can be up to $2 million with interest rates of 3 percent for private non-profit organizations of all sizes and 4 percent for small businesses, with terms up to 30 years. The SBA determines eligibility based on the size of the applicant, type of activity and its financial resources. Loan amounts and terms are set by the SBA and are based on each applicant's financial condition. These working capital loans may be used to pay fixed debts, payroll, accounts payable, and other bills that could have been paid had the disaster not occurred. The loans are not intended to replace lost sales or profits.

Applicants may apply online using the Electronic Loan Application (ELA) via SBA's secure website at https://disasterloan.sba.gov/ela.

Disaster loan information and application forms may also be obtained by calling the SBA's Customer Service Center at 800-659-2955 (800-877-8339 for the deaf and hard-of-hearing) or by sending an email to disastercustomerservice@sba.gov. Loan applications can be downloaded from the SBA's website at www.sba.gov. Completed applications should be mailed to: U.S. Small Business Administration, Processing and Disbursement Center, 14925 Kingsport Road, Fort Worth,TX 76155. 

Completed loan applications must be returned to SBA no later than April 29, 2013.

For more information about the SBA's Disaster Loan Program, visit our website at www.sba.gov.

Contact: Michael Lampton Phone: 404-331-0333

Release Number: 12-814, KY 13257

SOURCE U.S. Small Business Administration
Original Article Here


Saturday, 4 August 2012

US agriculture chief: Government needs help from Congress to provide better drought relief


By Associated Press,
Federal officials are using their limited options to help farmers facing widespread drought conditions, but they need Congress to pass legislation to provide better disaster relief, U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said Friday.
The House passed legislation Thursday to revive disaster relief programs for cattle and sheep producers affected by drought before lawmakers left for a five-week recess, but the Senate didn’t act on the bill.
Vilsack is pushing for more, saying passage of a comprehensive five-year farm policy bill would have a deeper, longer-lasting effect.
The drought and the various types of aid available to farmers and ranchers were among the concerns Vilsack discussed with producers Friday while visiting the Ohio State Fair.
“The president has instructed us to do everything we can to help. Our tools are going to be used, but they’re limited,” Vilsack told The Associated Press by phone afterward. “We need quick passage of the farm bill by the House of Representatives.”
The Senate has passed a version of the five-year bill, and a House committee approved similar legislation, but the House Republican leadership has resisted bringing it to the floor because of fears that conservative lawmakers might oppose spending levels in the bill. The head of the Senate Agricultural Committee, Sen. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., has said informal talks would be held over the recess in an effort to produce a plan that could be offered to both chambers next month.
Democratic opponents have characterized the measure passed Thursday by the House as cover for Republicans having to explain to rural constituents why they put off action on the comprehensive farm bill, and Vilsack added his criticism.
“The House passed, at the last minute, a piece of legislation which even many members acknowledge is more about politics than policy,” he said.
If the larger farm policy bill isn’t passed by the end of the fiscal year on Sept. 30, when the existing bill effectively ends, policies and programs such as disaster aid could lapse, creating more uncertainty for farmers and people in rural communities, he said.
This week, 218 counties in a dozen drought-stricken states were added to the federal government’s list of natural disaster areas as Vilsack unveiled new help for frustrated, cash-strapped farmers and ranchers grappling with extreme dryness and heat. That means more than half of all U.S. counties have been designated primary disaster areas this growing season, mostly due to drought.
“There’s no question that this is one of the most geographically expanded droughts we’ve confronted,” he said. “It’s affecting and impacting virtually every state of the Lower 48.”
Original Article Here


Saturday, 14 July 2012

US declares natural disaster in 26 states


The U.S. Department of Agriculture has declared a natural disaster as a widespread drought stretched over 1,016 counties in 26 states, covering over half the country. The natural disaster is said to be the largest in U.S. history due to its breadth.

The declaration will initiate a series of emergency loans for farmers in drought stricken areas; however, Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack said the low-interest loans and penalty reductions are only “limited tools” for relief. Common Dreams

HIGHLIGHTS

It was the largest declaration of a national disaster and was intended to speed relief to about a third of the country's farmers and ranchers who are suffering in drought conditions. Guardian

According to the National Climatic Data Center, some parts of the Midwest have experienced the worst conditions since 1988 as crops and pastures continue to sizzle. Common Dreams

And the record setting drought does not seem to be easing any time soon. Scientists for the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) recently released a report which ties extreme weather events such as prolonged heat waves and drought to the broader implications of climate change. June temperatures revealed that once again the past 12 months have been the warmest on record in the U.S. since the National Climatic Data Center began recording temperatures in 1895. Common Dreams

Subsequently, roughly 56% of the country is currently experiencing extreme drought conditions, the farthest reaching drought in over a decade, according to the U.S. Drought Monitor. Common Dreams
DT/HJ
Original article here

Wednesday, 4 July 2012

U.S. Agriculture secretary issues drought disaster declaration for Colorado farms


Vilsack (.)

John Fryar Longmont
U.S. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack on Tuesday issued a drought disaster designation for 62 of Colorado's 64 counties, making federal assistance available for at least some farmers and ranchers.
Vilsack notified Gov. John Hickenlooper of the disaster declaration on Tuesday, according to members of Colorado's congressional delegation, who were alerted to the action on Tuesday morning.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture has reviewed loss assessment reports and determined that there were sufficient losses in 62 counties -- all of Colorado's counties except Delta and San Juan -- to qualify them as "primary natural disaster areas due to losses caused by drought, excessive heat and high winds that occurred from Jan. 1, 2012,
and continuing," according to the letter.
The disaster designation makes farm operators eligible for assistance, including emergency loans, from the federal Farm Service Agency, provided other eligibility requirements are met.
Hickenlooper, who wrote Vilsack last week seeking assistance, said in a Tuesday afternoon statement, "This federal disaster declaration will give farmers and ranchers in Weld County and nearly every other part of the state much needed relief."
Farmers in eligible counties have eight months to apply for emergency loan assistance. The Farm Service Agency will consider each emergency loan application on its own merits, taking into account the extent of production losses, security available and repayment ability.

Weld County commissioners have backed their county's farmers' continuing push for state permission to pump water from an underground aquifer in the South Platte River Basin -- something Colorado Attorney General John Suthers' staff has advised that Hickenlooper doesn't have the legal authority to do.
Weld's commissioners then sought a formal legal opinion from Suthers, asking him to consider legal points raised by Weld County Attorney Bruce Barker.
Weld commissioners' spokeswoman Jennifer Finch said Tuesday that Suthers' office has declined the commissioners' request for a formal legal opinion.
Meanwhile, Weld commissioners announced Tuesday that they were asking about 30 ditch companies and others holding senior rights to surface water for their consent to allow Weld farmers to pump from those wells for up to 30 days to irrigate their fields during the drought.
"This would only be on pumps currently metered," commissioner Sean Conway told The Denver Post. "What we're asking for is very limited, and it's on an augmentation plan. Everything has to be put back."
For about six years, South Platte River Basin farmers have been prohibited by court decisions and state engineer's orders from using the wells that were long ago drilled into the aquifer.
Weld County commissioners wrote that farmers who rely solely on ditch rights to water their fields "are now completely out or very short of water, and their crops are dying in the field."
John Fryar can be reached at 303-684-5211 or jfryar@times-call.com.
Original Article Here

Thursday, 31 May 2012

Crops unsafe after 2011 disaster


AP Photo
FUKUSHIMA, Japan (AP) — Last year’s crop sits in storage, deemed unsafe to eat, but Toraaki Ogata is back at his rice paddies, driving his tractor trailing neat rows of seedlings. He’s living up to his family’s proud, six-generation history of rice farming, and praying that this time his harvest will not have too much radiation to sell.
That conflict is shared by several thousand farmers in more than 7,000 hectares (17,000 acres) of Fukushima, where some of last year’s harvest exceeded government safety standards because of radiation released when the March 2011 tsunami set off the world’s second-worst nuclear accident.
For their rice to be sold, it will have to be tested — every grain of it.
“All I can do is pray there will be no radiation,” Ogata, 58, said last week, wiping his sweat during a break in his 1.5-hectare paddy 60 kilometers (35 miles) from the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant. “It’s not our fault at all, but the land of our ancestors has been defiled.”
Rice farming is almost sacred in rural Japan, and the government protects farmers with tight restrictions on imports. Many farmers are too close to the nuclear disaster to return to the fields, but others have gotten the go-ahead, even with the risk their harvests may end up being too radiated to ship.
Hopes are high in this major agricultural northeastern prefecture (state) that farmers will meet the unprecedented challenge of producing safe-to-eat rice in contaminated soil.
Following orders from the government, they have sprinkled zeolite, a pebble-like material that traps radioactive cesium, and added fertilizer with potassium to help block radiation absorption. That work is part of the 100 billion yen ($1.3 billion) Tokyo has allocated for decontamination efforts this year.
There had been no time for that last year. Tens of thousands of bags of rice from that harvest were too radiated to be sold. The government bought those crops, which sit in giant mounds in storage.
Rice planting has been banned in the most contaminated areas, but the government allowed it at some farms in areas that produced contaminated rice last year, including Ogata’s. After the October harvest, their rice will be run through special machines that can detect the tiniest speck of radiation.
Ogata is filled with uncertainty. Though the government recently set up a system to buy and destroy his crop from last year, he has no assurances that it will do so again if this year’s rice can’t be eaten.
He also doesn’t know which experts to believe. Scientists often come to Fukushima to discuss radiation at neighborhood meetings, but some say there will be no health effects at all, while others say tens of thousands may get sick.
Radiation is expected to decline year by year. But Ogata and other farmers acknowledge they are in for a long haul.
Japan has a safety limit of radiation exposure at 1 millisievert per year, although some areas in Fukushima measure higher at about 20 millisieverts. A 20-kilometer (12-mile) no-go zone was set around the nuclear plant, displacing some 100,000 people.
Right next to the no-go zone, in Minami Soma, 135 farms have been granted special permission to plant rice as an experiment but on the condition that all rice, regardless of radiation levels, will be destroyed.
“We couldn’t even plant last year. We are doing everything we can as a whole town so we will be growing rice next year,” said Yukio Nishi, a Minami Soma agricultural cooperative official.
The government toughened its restrictions on radiation in rice and other food from April to 100 becquerels a kilogram (2 pounds) from the emergency 500 becquerels set in March last year. The limits are lower for milk, baby food and drinking water.
Medical experts say risks from low-dose radiation can’t be ruled out, but it may be impossible to prove whether a person got cancer from radiation or something else.
Exposure is cumulative and differs among individuals, depending on size and age, diet and habits. Certain foods, such as mushrooms and bamboo shoots, tend to be high in radiation. And children are more susceptible to radiation-related sicknesses.
“The balance that the government is now trying to strike is between allowing people to stay in the Fukushima area and recover their lives, and keeping the rest of Japan happy about buying food,” said Edward Lazo, who advises Fukushima as a radiation expert at the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development’s Nuclear Energy Agency. “And that’s a really difficult job.”
Christopher Clement, an expert at the International Commission on Radiological Protection, a global nonprofit authority on radiation health, says the food standards in Fukushima are safe. They are lower than the maximums set in Europe after Chernobyl.
Still, people across Japan — and even in Fukushima — are shunning food grown here, though Takeshi Takagi, a manager at the York Benimaru supermarket chain, said customers are gradually returning to locally grown produce.
York Benimaru has clearly labeled shelves for Fukushima-grown food, and bright banners encouraging shoppers to support local farmers. But some pass right by.
“We have our rice shipped from outside Fukushima,” said Tomohiko Hashimoto, a 30-year-old house-husband, strolling his infant son through the aisles. “We’re careful about what the mother eats, too. She is breastfeeding.”
Last year’s sales of Fukushima vegetables and fruit on the Tokyo wholesale market were 20 percent lower than the 2010 total, according to Metropolitan Central Wholesale Market data. Masataka Kase, spokesman for Tokyo Seika Co., a major wholesaler, said the drop came from crop damage from the disaster, shipment bans for radiation and consumer fears about Fukushima.
Ogata won’t need to sell his rice to skeptics. He plans to sell some of his 10,000 kilograms (22,000 pounds) of rice direct to customers he has cultivated for years, families who live in the area. The rest he will sell to a local farming cooperative that distributes to corporate buyers, such as restaurants, that are more willing to buy Fukushima rice.
A handful of farmers are giving up on growing rice. Some are switching to flowers, which don’t require radiation checks. Others are suing Tokyo Electric Power Co., the utility that operates Fukushima Dai-ichi, for damages.
Fukushima farmer Shoichi Watanabe is angry he even has to worry about radiation.
“See how peaceful this place is,” he said, pointing to paddies filled with gently croaking frogs. “I want to say at the top of my lungs that we would not be going through all this suffering — if only Tokyo Electric had done its job right.”

Original Article Here

LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...