Showing posts with label milk. Show all posts
Showing posts with label milk. Show all posts

Thursday, 24 January 2013

Rain key to state agriculture in 2013

Wisconsin's dairy farmers are poised for a strong 2013 because milk prices are expected to rise and feed prices are likely to drop, a panel of agriculture experts predicted Wednesday. Crop farmers, on the other hand, face a key unknown — whether they'll get enough rainfall to compensate for last year's prolonged parched conditions.

Wisconsin produced a record 27.2 billion pounds of milk last year, remaining the nation's second-leading producer behind California. However, the 4 percent increase didn't necessarily translate to more money for Wisconsin's dairy farmers because it was offset by lower milk prices and higher feed costs.

Worldwide demand suggests that milk prices are likely to rise, while the price of feed is expected to stabilize, said Mark Stephenson, a professor at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

Stephenson was a featured speaker at the annual Wisconsin Agricultural Economic Outlook Forum, which was held Wednesday in Madison. The event typically features about half a dozen agriculture professors who forecast the outlook for key Wisconsin products.

Most speakers said they were most concerned about lingering effects from last year's dry weather. The drought was severe enough that most fruit and vegetable crops were hit hard, and the crops that fared well were largely those that could tap into water reserves deep in the soil.

This year those water reserves are partially depleted, and it would take about 12 inches of rain statewide to replenish them, according to a Status of Wisconsin Agriculture 2013 report produced by UW-Madison.

Weather patterns have been too uncertain in recent years to predict rainfall with any certainty, so the best crop farmers can do is hope for enough rain to compensate for last year, said Brenda Boetel, an agricultural economist at UW-River Falls.

She also cautioned that consumers might pay extra for beef in the grocery store this year. Many dairy and beef farmers culled their herds last year because the drought sent feed costs soaring, and the U.S. supply was further limited because the demand for beef has increased in developing countries.

"Beef that cost $5 per pound last year might cost 10 to 20 cents more this year," she said.
Original article Here

Monday, 31 December 2012

Senate, House agriculture committees in deal to avert milk price spike

By Jim Wolf
Farm-state lawmakers have agreed to a one-year extension of the expiring U.S. farm law that, if enacted, would head off a possible doubling of retail milk prices to $7 or more a gallon in early 2013.

The extension would end a 32-month attempt to update farm subsidies dating from the Depression era, when farmers were crushed by low prices and huge crop surpluses, to meet today's high-wire challenges of tight food supplies, high operating costs and volatile markets.

House Agriculture Committee Chairman Frank Lucas, an Oklahoma Republican, said on Sunday he hoped the legislation would be passed by Congress and signed by President Barack Obama by Tuesday to avoid higher prices for milk in grocery stores.

The bill was listed among measures that could be called for a vote on Monday in the House of Representatives although action was not guaranteed.

Despite consensus on the need to extend the farm bill, lawmakers continue to discuss how long the extension should be.

Representative Tom Cole, an Oklahoma Republican, told reporters late on Sunday a nine-month farm bill extension was being considered as part of deal being crafted in the Senate to stave off the "fiscal cliff" of automatic tax hikes and spending cuts that begin kicking in on January 1.

"There's good chance that if there is a package out of the Senate, it will include something on the farm bill. The easiest thing to get done would be nine months of current law," Cole said.

A second Republican, Representative Steven LaTourette, said a nine-month extension could be part of the fiscal cliff package or could move separately if the fiscal talks fail.

House Republican leaders refused to call a vote during the fall on a full-scale, $500 billion farm bill on grounds it might fail because it did not cut spending enough.

Grain, soybean and cotton growers would get another round of the $5 billion "direct payment" subsidy that all sides agreed to kill in a new farm bill. The payments are made regardless of need. Reformers say the payments are unjustified when crop prices and farm income are at near-record levels.

DISASTER MONEY AND A NEW DAIRY PROGRAM

Also in the extension, lawmakers would revive agricultural disaster-relief programs that ran out of money a year ago and create a new dairy subsidy program. It would compensate dairy farmers whenever milk prices are low and feed prices are high. The so-called margin protection program would require farmers to limit production to avert a long run of low dairy prices.

Traditionally, the dairy program sets a minimum price for milk through government purchase of butter, cheese and dry milk. If Congress does not act, the dairy support price will revert on Tuesday to the level dictated by an outmoded 1949 law and which is roughly double the price now paid to farmers.

The potential retail milk price has been estimated at $6 to $8 a gallon versus current levels near $3.50.

Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack, during an interview broadcast by CNN, said higher milk prices - if it comes to that - would ripple throughout all commodities "if this thing goes on for an extended period of time."

Senator Debbie Stabenow, chairwoman of the Senate Agriculture Committee, said the "responsible short-term farm bill extension ... not only stops milk prices from spiking, but also prevents eventual damage to our entire agriculture economy."

TWO FALLBACKS IF EXTENSION FALTERS

House Republican leaders readied two alternatives, if needed, to the one-year extension. One was a one-month extension of the now-expired 2008 farm law without disaster funds or the new dairy program and the other was a one-month suspension of the dairy provisions of the 1949 law.

It was not clear which bill would be called for debate, a farm lobbyist said on Sunday. A small-farm activist said any package passed by Congress must include rural economic development funds and money for soil conservation on "working lands," the largest of USDA's conservation programs.

"If a new farm bill doesn't pass this Congress, we'll soon hold another mark-up and just keep working until one is enacted next year," said Stabenow, a Michigan Democrat.

It would be the first time on record that Congress began drafting a farm bill during a two-year session and had to carry it into the following session, congressional researchers said. Hearings on the new farm bill began April 21, 2010.

HOUSE, SENATE DISPUTE ON BIG CUTS

While dairy producers generally support the so-called margin-protection program as the answer to high feed costs, processors and foodmakers oppose it. They say it is wrong-minded in its premise of curtailing production when prices are low, and it will destroy a healthy export market for dairy products.

The rejuvenated disaster programs would cover losses from this year's widespread drought, especially for livestock producers, although tree farmers, honey bees and farm-raised fish are also covered. Maximum payment would be $100,000.

Senators passed a farm bill in June estimated to save $23 billion over 10 years, with most of the cuts in crop subsidies and conservation programs. The House Agriculture Committee approved a bill with $35 billion in cuts in July, half of it in food stamps for the poor - the biggest cut in food stamps in a generation.

Fiscally conservative House Republicans have called for larger cuts in farm subsidies and food stamps while some House Democrats opposed any food stamp cuts.

(Additional reporting by Charles Abbott, David Lawder and Richard Cowan; Editing by Ros Krasny, Maureen Bavdek, Jan Paschal and Eric Walsh)
Original Article Here

Friday, 24 August 2012

No relief in forecast for rise in food prices


WASHINGTON — The Agriculture Department said Friday that consumers can still expect higher food prices next year, but the expected increase was unchanged from last month, even as extreme heat in the Farm Belt continues to reduce the grain harvest and increase feed prices for livestock.
According to the latest Agriculture Department consumer food price index, overall food prices are expected to increase 3 percent to 4 percent next year largely because of the drought, the same as last month's forecast.

“The data out this morning shows that nothing much has changed,” said Ephrain Leibtag, deputy director of research at the Economic Research Service at the Agriculture Department.

The price of beef and veal will see the largest increases next year, the report said, almost entirely because of higher costs for feed, which is made from corn and other grains. Beef and veal prices are expected to increase 4 percent to 5 percent. The most immediate impact of the drought will be seen in poultry prices, the government predicted.

The Agriculture Department said consumers will see higher poultry prices this year because chickens consume feed more quickly than other livestock.

Government forecasters reiterated their projection of a 3.5 percent to 4.5 percent jump in chicken and turkey prices this year. The prices are expected to rise a bit less next year, in the range of 3 percent to 4 percent, the government said.

About 40 percent of the corn crop is used to feed livestock. Feed costs account for 50 percent to 70 percent of livestock and poultry production, according to the American Feed Industry Association, a trade group.

The increase in feed prices has caused many cattle producers to sell off or cull their herds. Cattle sales are up nearly 30 percent over last year, said Sara Baker, a spokeswoman for Sageworks, a financial information company based in New York that tracks the sales.

Ironically, the Agriculture Department said the reduction in the number of cows could result in a temporary decline in beef prices this year as a surplus of cattle is sold and more meat enters the market.

Cheese and milk products are expected to increase 3.5 percent to 4.5 percent next year, unchanged from last month's forecast. Egg prices will also be affected, with prices forecast to rise 3 percent to 4 percent next year.

A government estimate released earlier this month said that because of worsening drought conditions, farmers would produce about 10.6 billion bushels of corn this year, down from what was projected at the beginning of the year to be a record 15 billion bushels. The reduction in corn and soybean supplies has pushed up their prices to record levels.

The Agriculture Department said this week that 85 percent of this year's corn crop was in drought-impacted areas, and 83 percent of the soybean crop was threatened.

As of Monday, just 23 percent of the corn crop was rated in good or excellent condition, while 31 percent of soybeans were rated good or excellent.
Original Article Here

Saturday, 18 August 2012

The Dangers of Raw Milk: Unpasteurized Milk Can Pose a Serious Health Risk


Milk and milk products provide a wealth of nutrition benefits. But raw milk can harbor dangerous microorganisms that can pose serious health risks to you and your family. According to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, more than 800 people in the United States have gotten sick from drinking raw milk or eating cheese made from raw milk since 1998.
Raw milk is milk from cows, sheep, or goats that has not been pasteurized to kill harmful bacteria. This raw, unpasteurized milk can carry dangerous bacteria such as Salmonella, E. coli, and Listeria, which are responsible for causing numerous foodborne illnesses.
These harmful bacteria can seriously affect the health of anyone who drinks raw milk, or eats foods made from raw milk. However, the bacteria in raw milk can be especially dangerous to pregnant women, children, the elderly, and people with weakened immune systems.

"Pasteurized Milk" Explained

Pasteurization is a process that kills harmful bacteria by heating milk to a specific temperature for a set period of time. First developed by Louis Pasteur in 1864, pasteurization kills harmful organisms responsible for such diseases as listeriosis, typhoid fever, tuberculosis, diphtheria, and brucellosis.
Research shows no meaningful difference in the nutritional values of pasteurized and unpasteurized milk. Pasteurized milk contains low levels of the type of nonpathogenic bacteria that can cause food spoilage, so storing your pasteurized milk in the refrigerator is still important.

Raw Milk & Pasteurization: Debunking Milk Myths

While pasteurization has helped provide safe, nutrient-rich milk and cheese for over 120 years, some people continue to believe that pasteurization harms milk and that raw milk is a safe healthier alternative.
Here are some common myths and proven facts about milk and pasteurization:
  • Pasteurizing milk DOES NOT cause lactose intolerance and allergic reactions. Both raw milk and pasteurized milk can cause allergic reactions in people sensitive to milk proteins.
  • Raw milk DOES NOT kill dangerous pathogens by itself.
  • Pasteurization DOES NOT reduce milk's nutritional value.
  • Pasteurization DOES NOT mean that it is safe to leave milk out of the refrigerator for extended time, particularly after it has been opened.
  • Pasteurization DOES kill harmful bacteria.
  • Pasteurization DOES save lives.

Raw Milk and Serious Illness

Symptoms and Advice

Symptoms of foodborne illness include:
  • Vomiting, diarrhea, and abdominal pain
  • Flulike symptoms such as fever, headache, and body ache
While most healthy people will recover from an illness caused by harmful bacteria in raw milk - or in foods made with raw milk - within a short period of time, some can develop symptoms that are chronic, severe, or even life-threatening.
If you or someone you know becomes ill after consuming raw milk or products made from raw milk - or, if you are pregnant and think you could have consumed contaminated raw milk or cheese - see a doctor or healthcare provider immediately.

The Dangers of Listeria and Pregnancy

pregnant womanPregnant women run a serious risk of becoming ill from the bacteria Listeria which can cause miscarriage, fetal death or illness or death of a newborn. If you are pregnant, consuming raw milk - or foods made from raw milk, such as Mexican-style cheese like Queso Blanco or Queso Fresco - can harm your baby even if you don't feel sick.

Protect Your Family with Wise Food Choices

Most milk and milk products sold commercially in the United States contain pasteurized milk or cream, or the products have been produced in a manner that kills any dangerous bacteria that may be present. But unpasteurized milk and products made from unpasteurized milk are sold and may be harmful to your health. To avoid getting sick from the dangerous bacteria found in raw milk, you should choose your milk and milk products carefully. Consider these guidelines:

Okay to Eat

  • Pasteurized milk or cream
  • Hard cheeses such as cheddar, and extra hard grating cheeses such as Parmesan
  • Soft cheeses, such as Brie, Camembert, blue-veined cheeses,Queso Fresco cheese and Mexican-style soft cheeses such as Queso Fresco, Panela, Asadero, and Queso Blanco made frompasteurized milk
  • Processed cheeses
  • Cream, cottage, and Ricotta cheese made from pasteurizedmilk
  • Yogurt made from pasteurized milk
  • Pudding made from pasteurized milk
  • Ice cream or frozen yogurt made from pasteurized milk

Unsafe to Eat

  • Unpasteurized milk or cream
  • Soft cheeses, such as Brie and Camembert, and Mexican-style soft cheeses such as Queso Fresco, Panela, Asadero, and Queso Blanco made from unpasteurized milk
  • Yogurt made from unpasteurized milk
  • Pudding made from unpasteurized milk
  • Ice cream or frozen yogurt made from unpasteurized milk

When in Doubt - Ask!

Taking a few moments to make sure milk is pasteurized - or that a product isn't made from raw milk - can protect you or your loved ones from serious illness.
  • Read the label. Safe milk will have the word "pasteurized" on the label. If the word "pasteurized" does not appear on a product's label, it may contain raw milk.
  • Don't hesitate to ask your grocer or store clerk whether milk or cream has been pasteurized, especially milk or milk products sold in refrigerated cases at grocery or health food stores.
  • Don't buy milk or milk products at farm stands or farmers' markets unless you can confirm that it has been pasteurized.
Original Article Here

Monday, 23 July 2012

How to stop our milk industry turning sour


By Caroline Spelman
Few of us could imagine the British countryside or British farming without cows grazing in our fields. But those cows, and the farmers who devote their lives to the dairy industry, are under threat. Dairy is our biggest, most iconic farming sector, and recent farm-gate cuts of the price of milk have been a severe blow for thousands of people, putting the future of the entire industry at risk.
The status quo just isn’t working. If things don’t change, the industry could end up being a shadow of its current self. But I am convinced that if we get things right, there are so many opportunities, at home and abroad, for it to prosper.
The Government cannot and should not set prices. It’s illegal and wouldn’t guarantee our industry a long-term future — quite the opposite. But we are pushing hard for real changes to be made at all levels of the supply chain so the industry can get back on its feet and prosper. A year ago, Jim Paice, the Minister for Agriculture, urged representatives of farmers and milk processors to agree a strong industry code of practice on contractual relationships.
It would cover issues such as the way price is worked out, notice periods, contract lengths, volume and exclusivity rights. This would increase trust and transparency and give farmers a fairer deal. Over the past two weeks we’ve stepped up meetings with both sides, and we are a whisker away from an agreement. It is urgent that we break the deadlock.
That’s why we’ve brought forward the meeting scheduled for tomorrow with all the main players to today, at the Royal Welsh Show, to broker a deal.
Original Article Here

Tuesday, 10 July 2012

Agriculture minister admits he does not know price of milk

Jim Paice said price cuts were a "massive burden"
for most UK milk producers
The agriculture minister has admitted he does not know how much a pint of milk costs, telling the BBC his wife "buys most of it".
Jim Paice's comments come as smaller milk producers plan a protest in London on Wednesday against cuts in many of the main processors' prices, which they say are putting farms out of business.
Mr Paice warned them against "militant" action when they reached Westminster.
But he added there was "clearly something wrong with the market".
Some supermarkets sell non-organic milk for about 30p a pint, for larger bottle sizes. Single-pint bottles are offered at nearer 50p, with smaller shops often charging more.
Milk delivered to the doorstep costs consumers about 65p a pint.
'Market in operation'
Politicians are frequently asked questions like the price of bread or milk as part of a "normality" test by interviewers.
Appearing on BBC Radio 4's Farming Today, Mr Paice said: "We buy our milk usually from a local supermarket, which is one that has has an aligned chain, so paying the higher rates [to dairies], or from the corner shop in the village."
Asked if he knew the cost of the milk he purchased, he replied: "No, because my wife buys most of it. But I have checked where it comes from."
Robert Wiseman, Britain's biggest fresh milk company, was taken over by European dairy giant Muller in January. In June, the company cut the price it pays for milk by 2p per litre. It plans to reduce it again by 1.7p in August.
Its standard litre price would then be 24.73p, which small dairy owners say is below cost price.
Mr Paice said: "When you see that the price of bottled water is far more than the price of milk per litre, then there's clearly something wrong with the market place.
"But every supermarket, every retailer has to compete and, if others are selling their milk for less, then they are going to have to sell their milk for less to be able to sell any milk at all. That's the market in operation"
Following Wiseman's move, other milk processors in the UK announced price cuts last week.
Farming unions have demanded a reversal, ahead of the protest on Wednesday, when they will also meet Mr Paice. Some dairy owners have said they are considering disrupting supplies.
Mr Paice said the price cuts were "a massive burden for the vast majority of dairy farmers", adding: "I do not support physical protest, but if they want to come to London and express their views, then I entirely understand that and support it.
"If there is a call for more militant activity then I will condemn it. That's not the right way forward."
For Labour, shadow environment secretary Mary Creagh said: "Farmers and consumers will be shocked that he doesn't know the price of milk when people are struggling to pay for their weekly shop and there's a crisis in the dairy industry.
"At the dairy summit tomorrow, Jim Paice will call for farmers to get a decent price for their milk - the trouble is, he is so incompetent he hasn't a clue what it should be."
The National Farmers' Union has said it will support any action that is peaceful and legal.
Original Article Here

Saturday, 23 June 2012

Uganda: Govt Warns On Unsafe Milk


Government has issued a warning to the public against consuming milk that is unprocessed or unboiled.
The ministry of agriculture said the sale and transportation of milk in cans is illegal.
State minister for agriculture, Bright Rwamirama said the Dairy Development Authority carries milk inspections on local milk vendors and processors twice a day but there are unscrupulous individuals who dilute and contaminate the milk once the inspections are done.
"We encourage the public to consume milk that is packaged. If you must consume milk that is sold in cans then you must boil it to avoid diseases like brucellosis.
"Most of the milk sold in cans has a lot of water added to it and sometimes posho to increase its density," Rwamirama said. He was addressing journalists in Kampala at the launch of a campaign to mark the June Dairy Month.
He said families buy 'loose' or unprocessed milk at sh800 per liter because it looks cheaper than buying processed milk at sh1200 per liter.
The minister stressed that 'loose' milk is never pure milk and that the penalty for selling dilute or contaminated milk is a loss of a trading license and fine or imprisonment.
He urged Ugandans to drink more milk saying it was a source of nutrition. "In Uganda the per capita milk consumption of milk per year stands at 54 liters compared to the 200 liters per capita year recommended by World Health Organization (WHO). Kenya's per capita consumption of milk is 100 liters per year," Rwamirama said.
Government Is boosting milk production in the country through improving veterinary services, improving animal nutrition, genetic improvement, restocking and heifer distribution to families and households.
"Annual milk production has increased from 1.5b liters in June last year to 1.8b this year. Milk transport tankers have increased from 99 to 126. The number of processing plants has increased from 22 to 30.
"The plants process pasteurized milk, UHT, yogurt and milk powder. Importation of milk products has declined because of the increase in supply and processing," he said.
Dr Jolly Zaribwende, executive director Dairy Development Authority said babies below one year of age need milk all the time either from breast milk or from cows and goats.
"Adults need one glass of milk a day. Milk has calcium and is good for the growth of teeth and bones. Even elderly people need more milk to keep their bones strong," she said.
Original Article Here

Thursday, 21 June 2012

Agriculture boom behind rising GDP


The NZD is down slightly after passing the US eighty cent mark for the first time in weeks, following positive GDP figures.
Agriculture is at its highest level in five years with good grass growth fuelling milk production.
It's helped push GDP, up 1.1 %, nearly three times higher than officials predicted.
Farmer Graeme Stuart says the agricultural sector has had a massive impact on New Zealand's economic climate.
 "It has been a very good season from pretty much woah to go. Milk is 26 to 27 percent of New Zealand's income."
Last year's first-quarter gross domestic product figure was more than twice the market's expectation when first released, though it was subsequently revised.
This year the department has removed and then added back one quarter to 2008's deep recession.
Darren Gibbs, chief economist at Deutsche Bank, said he struggled to see how the economy grew such apace in the first quarter of this year.
"By looking at other sources of data, nothing suggests the economy is doing okay," he said.
"The Reserve Bank will be more circumspect in how it interprets this."
Statistics New Zealand put much of the gain down to bigger agricultural production after the stellar growing conditions, with the agriculture, forestry and fishing sector growing 2.1% to $2.12 billion.
Since the end of 2011, dairy prices have been falling on Fonterra's online trading platform, and the exporter recently trimmed its forecast payout to farmers as a resiliently high kiwi dollar erodes the value of overseas sales.
BNZ's Steel said those growing conditions probably will not be repeated, and there will be some impact as that effect washes through the annual numbers.
The manufacturing sector rose 1.8% to $4.72 billion as greater milk production stoked output of dairy products. Food, beverage and tobacco manufacturing climbed 3.2%.
Figures yesterday showed the current account deficit widened deficit of $2.8 billion in the quarter on weaker dairy prices and a drop off in visitors after the Rugby World Cup.
There was a $416 million build-up in inventories due to greater manufacturing and a decrease in exports.
Original Article Here

Wednesday, 6 June 2012

Belarus’ dairy exports to Russia run as scheduled


Belarusian dairy products are supplied to Russia in accordance with the plan that Belarus and Russia agreed on this year, said Deputy Agriculture and Food Minister of Belarus Vasily Kazakevich at the exhibition Belagro 2012, BelTA learnt.

“The statements by the National Dairy Producers Union (Soyuzmoloko) alleging that Belarus uses dumping prices are groundless,” the Deputy Minister noted. Belarus-Russia dairy supplies are determined annually in accordance with the demand and supply projections, he said. According to Vasily Kazakevich, Belarus is to supply Russia with about 4 million tonnes of dairy products this year.

Soyuzmoloko previously suggested suspending imports of whole cream milk powder, skimmed milk powder, whey powder and butter with a fat content of 72.5% and 82.5% from Belarus for the period from 4 July till 1 December 2012 “in order to stabilize the prices for the aforementioned products on the Russian market and stop dumping on the part of Belarusian producers.”

The Russian National Dairy Producers Union also suggested imposing such sanctions against similar dairy products from other countries.

The Belarusian Agriculture and Food Ministry has nto received any notification from the Ministry of Agriculture of Russia about possible temporary suspension of dairy imports, Vasily Kazakevich emphasized.

Belagro 2012 is held from 5 to 10 June. The exhibition is organized by MinskExpo with the support from and direct participation of the Agriculture and Food Ministry, the Industry Ministry and the National Academy of Science of Belarus. Taking part in the exhibition this year are over 300 companies from 18 countries.
Original Article Here

Monday, 21 May 2012

ICAR: Rise of temperature not a cause of worry for agriculture


PTI 
NEW DELHI: Though no immediate adverse impact of global warming is visible in India as manifested by rise in output of foodgrains and milk, experts feel the country should draw sharp strategy to deal with its long-term effect.

Despite increase in climatic variabilities attributed to global warming, the production of foodgrains in the country has increased from 230.77 million tonnes (mt) in 2007-08 to 244.78 mt in 2010-11, the government had informed Parliament last week.

During the same period output of milk rose from 107.90 mt to 121.80 mt due to various advanced technological interventions across the country, it said.

Though no immediate adverse impact of global warming on agriculture is visible, experts feel the country needs to draw effective strategy to deal with its future consequences as it is a long-term phenomenon.

"Rise of 0.2 degree celsius temperature now is not a cause of worry for agriculture in the country, but there could be problem after 5-6 decades for which we need to be alert," Director General of ICAR S Ayyappan told PTI.

He said in the long-term even if agri productivity is not affected due to global warming there could be problem of pest, diseases etc., in the crops.

Farm expert and former head of ICAR Mangala Rai said: "Long-term planning to deal with global warming when the temperature might increase by 2.5 to 3 degree celsius is absolutely necessary."

Minister of State for Agriculture Harish Rawat had said in Parliament last week that though there is no conclusive evidence to suggest significant variations in climate change, global warming and its impact on agricultural productivity, the government has intensified implementation of various schemes to deal with the problem.

He said programmes like Macro Management of Agriculture, Rashtriya Krishi Vikas Yojna, National Food Security Mission, National Horticulture Mission and National Mission on Micro Irrigation have been formulated to make Indian agriculture climate resilient by embedding and mainstreaming various adaptation measures.

Sources in International Crops Research Institute for Semi-Arid Tropics (ICRISAT) said the Hyderabad-based international farm research organisation is developing heat tolerant chickpea and ground nut to protect the crops from adverse impact of global warming.
Original Article Here

Agriculture, industry thriving side by side in Gujarat: Modi

Ahmedabad: Outlining various facets of development in Gujarat, Chief Minister Narendra Modi on Sunday said the state has struck a balance between agricultural and industrial growth.
"At a time when India's agriculture is not growing beyond 3 per cent, Gujarat's agriculture is growing at 11 per cent, despite the fact that unlike the rest of the country, the state is not blessed with perennial rivers," Modi said addressing NRIs across 12 cities in the US through a video-conferencing session.
The Chief Minister said Gujarat has achieved "balanced growth" in sectors like agriculture, industry and services. Speaking about agricultural growth, Modi told the overseas audience that the agricultural income has shot up to Rs 96,000 crore as compared to Rs 14,700 crore a decade ago, with farmers being the major beneficiaries.
"From 108 lakh hectares of agriculture land in 2001, Gujarat now has 135 lakh hectares," Modi said adding that he would not let the agriculture land get reduced.
This is for the first time that agriculture and industry are thriving side by side on such a vast scale, he asserted.
Modi told them that Gujarat's milk production has risen by 68 per cent and the state is taking great strides in cotton production. In 2001, Gujarat produced 23 lakh bales of cotton, but today the figure stands at 1.23 crore bales (one bale equals 170 kg).
Modi said Gujarat was surging ahead in the manufacturing sector as well and was all set to turn into Asia's auto-hub. Even American auto giant Ford is coming to Gujarat, he said.
While addressing the gathering, he pointed out that American companies had invested Rs 15,000 crore in Gujarat and Canada had been working with the state in close coordination for quite some time.
Modi invited the audience to visit the state during the upcoming 2013 'Vibrant Gujarat' Summit and the Uttarayan festivities.
Modi also spoke about Gujarat's advancement in the field of solar energy. He claimed that the state has dedicated 600 MW to the national grid, while the rest of the country is producing only 120 MW of solar energy.
The solar park set up at Charanka will be the Asia's largest, Modi said.
He also claimed that the innovative canal-top solar power project was beneficial in saving about one crore litres of water per kilometer from evaporation annually and would save 16 per cent of electricity and land for farmers.
Original article here

Saturday, 19 May 2012

2.7 Billion New Consumers for Dairy Industry


GLOBAL - New research from Tetra Pak has identified 2.7 billion low-income consumers in developing countries as the dairy industry’s next big growth opportunity due to an expected rise in prosperity, purchasing power and desire for packaged liquid dairy products (LDP).

Consumption by low-income consumers in developing markets is forecast to increase from about 70 billion litres in 2011 to almost 80 billion litres in 2014, according to the Dairy Index, which tracks worldwide facts, figures and trends in the global dairy industry. Many of these consumers are expected to switch in coming years from drinking loose milk to packaged milk.

“Low-income consumers represent one of the biggest growth opportunities for the dairy industry. The key to tomorrow’s success is reaching these consumers today,” said Tetra Pak President and CEO Dennis Jönsson. “They make up almost 40 per cent of the world’s population and live in economies driving our industry’s growth and they are growing more affluent.”

These low-income consumers live on $2-$8 a day and are virtually untapped by today’s dairy processors, they make up about 50 per cent of developing countries’ population and consume 38 per cent of LDP in developing countries. Half of these consumers live in India and China. The Tetra Pak research focused on six countries which account for more than 76 per cent of LDP consumption by consumers in developing countries: India, China, Indonesia, Brazil, Pakistan and Kenya.

“Today’s low-income consumers are tomorrow’s middle class,” said Mr Jönsson, noting “this is a golden opportunity for dairy processors to cultivate consumer loyalty among a new generation of dairy consumers in developing countries.”

Tapping into this market is not without its challenges, according to the report. Tetra Pak has identified three key challenges for dairy processors seeking to reach consumers in this growth market. They need to make products which are affordable, available and attractive to consumers on limited incomes. That means dairy processors must produce healthy, safe and nutritious packaged dairy products without adding unsustainable costs. They must also make them available in small traditional stores in remote rural areas or congested cities where these low income consumers shop.

Innovation and efficiency will be vital in helping the industry to develop products, packaging and processing to meet the needs of these low-income consumers, according to the report.

“We must develop products differently, distribute them differently and sell them differently to extend the availability of good nutrition in developing countries,” said Mr Jönsson.

Tetra Pak has identified a number of ways to make products more affordable. Among them is changing the way both milk products and packages are developed – with the price of the product driving development. By using alternatives to whole milk – such as whey or lactic acid – it is also possible to produce nutritious and healthy dairy products at lower cost. Another way is to reduce package sizes or opt for more basic packaging.

Figuring out ways to make packaged dairy products widely available to DiP consumers is another challenge. Around 70 per cent of low income purchases are in the so-called traditional trade, small-family run shops rather than modern supermarkets or convenience stores. Companies are coming up with innovative ways to reach these consumers. They are producing locally where demand for packaged liquid dairy is growing. They are teaming-up with distributors who have a track-record of working closely with traditional stores and they are using appropriate transport, like bicycles, to distribute products.

Separately, Tetra Pak announced that LDP demand is set to accelerate in 2011-2014, led by Asia, Africa and Latin America. Global LDP consumption is forecast to rise by a CAGR of 2.9 per cent in 2011-2014, accelerating from 2.5 per cent in 2008-2011, led by buoyant demand in emerging markets.

Saturday, 12 May 2012

Proper Handling and Conuming Milk


Milk production began 6000 years ago or even earlier. The dairy animal of today have been developed from untamed animals which, through thousands of years, lived at different altitudes and latitudes exposed to natural and many times, sever and extreme conditions.

Nutritive value of milk

Milk is essential for maintaining the health of infants, providing nutrition to the masses and as a source for a wide variety of dairy products. It is essential to maintain the quality & quantity of milk. Cow's milk is among the most perishable of all foods, due to its fluid form and excellent nutritive composition.

The role of milk in nature is to nourish and provide immunological protection for the mammalian young. Milk has been a food source for humans since prehistoric times; from human, goat, buffalo, sheep and cows. Milk and honey are the only articles of diet whose sole function in nature is food. It is not surprising, therefore, that the nutritional value of milk is high. It supplies bodybuilding protein, bone forming minerals and health giving vitamins and furnish energy giving lactose and milk fat. Besides supplying certain essential fatty acids, it contains the above nutrients in an easily digestible and assimiable form. All these properties make milk an important food for pregnant mothers, growing children, adolescent, adults, invalids convalescents and patients.
Milk is also a very complex food with over 100,000 different molecular species found. There are many factors that can affect milk composition such as breed variations, feed variations, seasonal variations, and geographic variations. With all this in mind, only an approximate composition of buffalo milk can be given:
87.3% water (range of 85.5% - 88.7%)
5-6 % milk fat
7-8 % solids-not-fat
o Protein 3.25% (3/4 casein)
o Lactose 4.6%
o Minerals 0.65% - Ca, P, citrate, Mg, K, Na, Zn, Cl, Fe, Cu, sulfate, bicarbonate, many others
o Acids 0.18% - citrate, formate, acetate, lactate, oxalate
o Enzymes - peroxidase, catalase, phosphatase, lipase
o Gases - oxygen, nitrogen
o Vitamins - A, C, D, thiamine, riboflavin, others
Milk is in a liquid form. This may seem curious if one takes into consideration the fact that milk has less water than most fruits and vegetables. Milk can be described as:
1. An oil-in-water emulsion with the fat globules dispersed in the continuous serum phase
2. A colloid suspension of casein micelles, globular proteins and lipoprotein partilcles
3. A solution of lactose, soluble proteins, minerals, vitamins other components

Loose (wholesome) milk related issues

About 97.5 percent of milk produces in the country delivered to the consumer as loose (wholesome) milk. Unfortunately, there exists no law in our country regarding wholesome milk quality and quantity. If we see the composition of milk, it contains 87-88 % of the water and 12-13 % of the other milk constituents (solids) including fat, lactose, proteins, minerals and others. Wholesome milk's trade is based on liters (volume). The price of milk is paid on liter basis, ignoring the fact that how much solids milk actually contains. So some times consumer paid the same amount for 8 % solids (means one liter of milk produce only 80 gms of milk powder on drying) and some times for 12 % solids (means one liter of milk produce 120 gms of milk powder on drying) depend upon the amount of water added in milk. Dairymen (gowallas) also remove cream from milk; the de-creamed milk contains cream 0.5 to 1 percent or more while the whole milk contains not less than 3.5 percent cream (milk fat). They sell that de-creamed milk with the price of whole cream milk.

So far as the housewife is concerned, the parameters that characterize wholesome milk are without doubt of great interest. She may know of what use milk is in the diet and the food substances of which it is composed, but unless she understands just what constitutes milk of good quality, as well as the nature of inferior milk, she cannot very well provide her family with the kind it should have. Therefore, to assist her in this matter, the characteristics of wholesome milk are here discussed. Such milk, it will be well to note, must be of the right composition, must not be adulterated, must be fresh--that is, not older when delivered than is permitted by law---and must be as clean as possible.
The housewife usually judges the quality of milk by the amount of cream that rises to the top. This is really an excellent test, because milk that contains only a small amount of cream is of poorer quality than that which contains a larger amount; in other words, the more cream milk contains, the higher will be its food value and the greater its energy-producing ability.
Milk adulteration means extraction of any of the food substances from wholesome milk; the addition of anything that tends to weaken or lower its quality or strength; the use of coloring matter to make it appear of greater value than it actually is; or the use of preservatives to prevent it from souring as soon as it ordinarily would. It is, of course, illegal to adulterate milk, yet it is sometimes done.
The most convenient and possibly the most common materials used to adulterate milk are water and skim milk. The addition of water to milk decreases the quantity of all its food substances, but the addition of skim milk reduces the quantity of fat only. Sometimes the milk that a dairyman markets contains more fat than the law requires; but even such milk cannot be skimmed nor diluted with skim milk. The only thing that may be done to it is to mix it with milk that is low in butter fat. Dairymen add poor quality vegetable fat in milk to increase its fat contents to mask the fact that milk is not de-creamed. They add animal grade or expired milk powder and or whey powder in milk to increase its total solids and to give the thicker look to milk. Milk contains millions of microbes which with the passage of time and under improper storage conditions produces acidity (souring) in milk. To prevent milk from souring, dishonest milk dealers often put into it such preservatives as carbonate, bicarbonate, urea, lye, hydrogen peroxide, and formalin. There is no definite way of telling whether or not one of these has been used, except by a chemical analysis.
Dairymen add lye, carbonates and bicarbonates in milk to decrease acidity of fermented milk. Addition of these some times increases the pH of milk. Normal milk has a pH ranges from 6.65-6.85. To lower increased pH, they add boric acid or benzoic acid in milk. Urea is also added in milk to prevent acid fermentation of milk by microorganisms. Urea also increases Solid Non Fat (SNF) of milk and has buffering effect on milk i.e. it resist change in pH of milk.
Some dairymen even use various types of antibiotic to prevent spoilage of milk like penicillin. Some health hazard chemicals may also be used as hydrogen per oxide and formalin to increase shelf life of milk. Other hazards in milk consumption relate to the unhygienic manner the milk is stored in the dirty utensils and the addition of polluted canal or river water in it.
Sugar or glucose may not be harmful for consumer but there presence in milk actually indicates that dairymen add these to mask the effect of other harmful adulterants in milk. These also has thickening effect on milk so contribute to monitory loss to consumer as consumer pays for milk solids and in return have sugar and glucose as milk solids.
Wholesome milk should be absolutely fresh. However, it is almost impossible to obtain milk in this condition, because it is generally sold at a distance from the source of supply. Milk that is sold in small towns and cities is usually 12 and often 18 to 21 hours old when it is delivered; whereas, in large cities, where the demand is so great that milk must be shipped from great distances, it is often 24 to 36 or even 48 hours old when it reaches the consumer. In order that milk may remain sweet long enough to permit it to be delivered at places so far removed from the source of supply, it must be handled and cared for in the cleanest possible way by the dealers.

Milk Processing

Of the total milk produced in the country, only about 25-30% finds its way into urban markets through commercial marketing chains. It may come as a surprise that very minute fraction of total milk is processed in factories for long shelf life products. In the developed countries, due to the perishable nature of milk and the susceptibility of milk to transmit fatal diseases through microorganisms, the sale of un-pasteurized milk is prohibited. In Pakistan, milk processing potential is the need of the day to reduce milk-borne diseases, reduce milk spoilage losses, provide milk in far-flung areas, create a demand for high quality milk, and to standardize milk for human consumption according to international norms. However, it is an issue that processed milk is more costly than unprocessed milk, but the benefits outweigh the demerits Milk production, collection, distribution, processing, and marketing are huge businesses in themselves.

The milk from buffalos and cows is collected into metal cans, which were then emptied into tanks, form these tanks milk after chilling to 4-5 ºC is transported to dairy plant in isolated tanks for further processing.
At the dairy plant milk is tested for quality and milk that meets the quality parameters is again chilled and pumped into chilled holding tanks, then cleaned (either by being filtered or centrifuged) before Pasteurization followed by standardization/toning and homogenization and then transferred to another holding tank to await further processing. The further processing might include Ultra High temperature (UHT) and aseptic filling or drying to make dried milk.
Standardization and Toning
Standardization of milk involves the adjustment of the fat content of milk, or a milk product, by addition or removing of cream, or skim milk as appropriate, to obtain a given fat contents, while toning refers to adjustment of SNF contents of milk by reconstitution of milk powder in it. In dairy industry of Pakistan both these processes are used simultaneously

Pasteurization

The process of pasteurization was named after Louis Pasteur who discovered that spoilage organisms could be inactivated in wine by applying heat at temperatures below its boiling point. The process was later applied to milk and remains the most important operation in the processing of milk. Pasteurization in dairy industry can be defined as "The heating of every particle of milk or milk product to a specific temperature for a specified period of time without allowing recontamination of that milk or milk product during the heat treatment process."

Purpose There are two distinct purposes for the process of milk pasteurization:
1. Public Health Aspect: To make milk and milk products safe for human consumption by destroying all bacteria that may be harmful to health (pathogens)
2. Keeping Quality Aspect: To improve the keeping quality of milk and milk products. Pasteurization can destroy some undesirable enzymes and many spoilage bacteria. Shelf life can be 7, 10, 14 or up to 16 days.
Normally pasteurized milk is tested for a total count of microbes; contamination by gut microbes (a coliform test); that sufficient heat treatment has been provided (a phosphatase test); and the number of aerobic bacteria present (a dye reduction test). Legally pasteurized milk must pass the total (or plate) count test, the coliform test and the phosphatase test.

Homogenization

Milk is an oil-in-water emulsion, with the fat globules dispersed in a continuous skim milk phase. Milk fat occurs in milk as fat globules varying in size from 2 to 6 m. If raw milk were left to stand, however, the fat would rise and form a cream layer. Homogenization is a mechanical treatment of the fat globules in milk brought about by passing milk under high pressure through a tiny orifice, which results in a decrease in the average diameter and an increase in number and surface area, of the fat globules. The net result, from a practical view, is a much-reduced tendency for creaming of fat globules. Three factors contribute to this enhanced stability of homogenized milk: a decrease in the mean diameter of the fat globules, a decrease in the size distribution of the fat globules (causing the speed of rise to be similar for the majority of globules such that they don't tend to cluster during creaming), and an increase in density of the globules (bringing them closer to the continuous phase) owing to the adsorption of a protein membrane. Other advantages of homogenization include a richer flavor and possibly increased digestibility.


Ultra high Temperature (UHT) and Aseptic filling

While pasteurization conditions effectively eliminate potential pathogenic microorganisms, it is not sufficient to inactivate the thermo resistant spores in milk. The term sterilization refers to the complete elimination of all microorganisms. The food industry uses the more realistic term "commercial sterilization"; a product is not necessarily free of all microorganisms, but those that survive the sterilization process are unlikely to grow during storage and cause product spoilage.

Milk can be made commercially sterile by Ultra high temperature (UHT) where milk is heated to 136 to 140 ºC for 3-4 seconds. This milk is then packaged aseptically in specially designed multilayer containers. The heat treatment and packaging allow this milk to be stored at room temperature for extended periods of time. Ultra high temperature processing may cause some loss of folate, vitamin C (which is already low in milk), vitamin B1 2 , and thiamin. The usual methods of testing sterilized or UHT milk are the turbidity test and incubating samples.

Care of milk (both packed and unpacked) in Homes

Milk is a very nutritious food but it is equally nutritious to microbes and can easily become contaminated. To protect milk's quality, this food is handled under rigid sanitary conditions not at its production and procurement stage but also in homes, resulting in low bacterial count, good flavor and appearance, satisfactory keeping quality, high nutritive value, and freedom from disease-producing organisms and foreign constituents. Today, less than 1% of all disease out breaks due to infected foods and contaminated water involve milk and fluid milk products. The responsibility for ensuring milk's quality is shared by public health officials, the dairy industry, and consumers.

The consumer is responsible for protecting the quality of milk and other dairy foods in the home. To preserve the quality of milk and other dairy foods; the following practices are recommended for consumers:

a) Checking the quality of milk:
For industries, adulteration of milk is not a serious issue as these have all the facilities to test all kinds of adulteration. Actually, this issue is very much concerning to common consumer having a little awareness about the effect of these adulterants on quality of milk and on human health. Following are some important suggestions for the consumer of wholesome milk to check the quality of milk they purchased. Milk is a food whose smell and taste tells what exactly it is. To make smell and taste more prominent warm the milk at 40 ºC. if milk has some bitter taste there may be chances of adulteration of milk by urea or any poor quality vegetable oil. If milk has more sweet taste then it may either contain sugar or glucose. If it has saltish taste then either the milk is from infectious animal or milkman himself add salt (sodium chloride) in milk to prolong its shelf life. Color of milk may vary with addition of antibiotic or some time with the addition of vegetable oil. Some time milk has an oily layer on it, definitely it contains oil so don't accept this milk. The addition of any flour or any other starch can be detected by simply adding few drops of iodine solution (easily available from medical stores) into 1-2 ml milk. If black particles appear after adding and mixing iodine solution in milk it means milk is thickened with some thickener. If on boiling a thin layer of cream (Bali) is formed on milk surface or milk has a greenish tinch in color, it means the milk is de-creamed.

b) Proper boiling of milk:
Milk is boiled in home to kill microbes to shelf life and to increase digestibility of nutrients present in milk. Most people while boiling milk do not care about the time of boiling. Over boiled milk developed cooked flavor and taste and tends to darken in color. In this darken colored milk a reaction known as Mailard reaction takes place that is characterized by combining of milk protein (Casein) with milk sugar (Lactose) forming a compound Melanoidin, results into destruction of some essential amino acids in the milk. The proper way of milk boiling is that when milk rise in the pan, wait for few minutes and then remove the pan from fire, after this immediately cool the milk pan either by placing it in cool water or placing the pan in ice bath. This technique will not only help to kill more bacteria but also increase shelf life of the milk with minimum loss of the organoleptic properties and nutrients of the milk. Always strain the milk with strainer or with cotton cloth before boiling it. This will help to remove any extraneous material present in the milk. Preferably, always use same pan for storage of milk in which milk is boiled. When milk is transferred to another pan after boiling this result into cross contamination of milk with microbes. UHT processed milk don't need boiling.

c) Proper container for milk:
Use proper containers to protect milk from exposure to sunlight, bright daylight, and strong fluorescent light. This will prevent the development of off-flavors and reductions in light-sensitive nutrients such as riboflavin, ascorbic acid, and vitamin B6. Process milk is packed into containers, which don't allow the light to pass through. While in case of loose milk don't use plastic container, and polythene bags. Plastic containers have pores which act as hibernating places for microbes and hence increase the bacterial load of milk while carrying milk in polythene bag results into cross contamination of the milk. Actually when milk is transferred from polythene bags to any pan, bacterium from the hands are transferred into the milk and situation become even more worst if the person carrying polythene bag has wound or any contagious disease.

d) Milk serving:
Mostly in homes people take boiled milk after removing cream (Balai) from the milk. For normal healthy person this milk become deficient in milk fat and hence does not meet the normal requirements of a person. The best way is to remove half of the cream from milk especially in case of buffalo milk as it contains 5-6 percent fat. Remaining milk contain enough milk fat that meet the normal requirements of a healthy person.
People drink milk with balai on the upper surface of the milk glass. One cannot enjoy proper taste and flavor of the milk by this way. To enjoy actual taste and flavor of the milk try to drink milk with balai after little shaking in shaker (more shaking remove the milk fat from milk in the form of butter). This will distribute milk fat through out the glass.(a sort of homogenization).Taste and smell become more intense in this way and one can enjoy milk in a better way.
People drink milk by adding sugar (sucrose) in it. The sweetness of the sugar over comes the natural taste of the milk. The persons using sugar added milk can not distinguished between good and bad quality milk.
Try to make your habit to drink milk without addition of sugar keeping in view the fact that milk contains a unique type of sugar (Lactose) in it, no other food contains this sugar except dairy products. Processed milk means UHT milk contains minimum 3.5 % of fat and about 9 % of Solid non fat so that milk is served as such after opening and store in the refrigerator after use.

e)Storage of milk:
Refrigerate packed milk (after opening) and loose milk both at less than 10 ºC as soon as possible after purchase. Milk is a sensitive food, it immediately take the odor of the other fruits and vegetables so keep milk containers closed to prevent the absorption of other food flavors in the refrigerator. An absorbed flavor changes the taste but the milk is still safe. Use milk in the order purchased. Return the milk container to the refrigerator immediately to prevent bacterial growth. Temperatures above 10 ºC reduce the shelf life of milk and other milk products. Never return unused milk to the original container.
Do not use any pan, which has already been used for any vegetable or fruit serving or handling. Do not store the milk in fridge for long time with the fruits and vegetables.

f)Freezing:
With the exception of butter, ice cream, frozen yogurt, and other frozen dairy desserts, freezing of most dairy foods (e.g., milk, cream, yogurt, milk puddings, soft cheeses) is not recommended.
Milk is a food consumed by all age groups from infants to elders. So, every one in the society is deeply concerned with quality of milk at each stage of production, processing and consumption of packed and unpacked food. It is the duty of the government of Pakistan and local authorities, that they take milk production and trading (especially loose milk) related issues seriously and formulates a law regarding its sale and establish an authority to monitor and regulate its sale in the country comprising of doctors, veterinary doctors and Food scientists. Government is also required to launch a program for school going children and their parents to make them aware of the quality and quantity of the milk in true sense.

By: Shahid Hafeez Khan
M.Sc.(Hons) Food Technology, MS Total Quality Management
Manager Quality Control-MPD
Engro Foods Limited 
Courtesy Agrihunt.com


LinkWithin

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...